Quantcast
Article Index |Advertise | Mobile | RSS | Wireless | Newsletter | Archive | Corrections | Syndication | Contact us | About Us| Services
 
  Breaking News :    
Advertisement
Robinsons Land Corp.
Sta Lucia Realty

INQUIRER ALERT
Get the free INQUIRER newsletter
Enter your email address:

 
Breaking News / Nation Type Size: (+) (-)
You are here: Home > News > Breaking News > Nation

  ARTICLE SERVICES      
     Reprint this article     Print this article  
    Send as an e-mail     Send Feedback  
    Post a comment   Share  

  RELATED STORIES  




imns



Gov’t appeals junking of rap against Estrada

By Edson C. Tandoc Jr.
Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 02:52:00 06/30/2009

Filed Under: Joseph Estrada, Graft & Corruption, Litigation & Regulations

MANILA, Philippines—Government lawyers have asked the Sandiganbayan anti-graft court to reconsider its order dismissing the last perjury case against deposed president and convicted plunderer Joseph Estrada and allow him to freely travel abroad.

In a motion for reconsideration, the Office of the Special Prosecutor said the court’s resolution, issued about two weeks ago, merely acted on Estrada’s motion to lift the hold departure order against him and should not have dismissed the last perjury case.

“It is thus very clear that what was being resolved by this honorable court was the motion to lift the hold-departure order and not the dismissal of Criminal Case No. 26564,” it said.

The anti-graft court convicted Estrada of plunder in September 2007 and sentenced him to 40 years in prison. The court also acquitted Estrada in one of two perjury cases.

Estrada never served the prison term, however, as President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo granted him a pardon barely a month after.

Last month, Estrada petitioned the Sandiganbayan Special Division to lift the hold-departure order against him. The court granted the motion, citing the pardon he received and his acquittal in the perjury case. The court also dismissed the second perjury case against Estrada, Criminal Case No. 26564, ruling that the issue had become moot.

The prosecution argued, however, that Estrada should have first filed a motion seeking to dismiss the case against him before the court could act on it.



Copyright 2009 Philippine Daily Inquirer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.



Share

RELATED STORIES:

OTHER STORIES:



  ^ Back to top

© Copyright 2001-2009 INQUIRER.net, An INQUIRER Company

The INQUIRER Network: HOME | NEWS | SPORTS | SHOWBIZ & STYLE | TECHNOLOGY | BUSINESS | OPINION | GLOBAL NATION | Site Map
Services: Advertise | Buy Content | Wireless | Newsletter | Low Graphics | Search / Archive | Article Index | Contact us
The INQUIRER Company: About the Inquirer | User Agreement | Link Policy | Privacy Policy

Advertisement
Megaworld
Filinvest
Property Guide
Xoom
Inquirer VDO