Quantcast
Article Index |Advertise | Mobile | RSS | Wireless | Newsletter | Archive | Corrections | Syndication | Contact us | About Us| Services
 
  Breaking News :    
Advertisement
Property Guide
Inquirer Mobile

INQUIRER ALERT
Get the free INQUIRER newsletter
Enter your email address:




 
Breaking News / Nation Type Size: (+) (-)
You are here: Home > News > Breaking News > Nation

  ARTICLE SERVICES      
     Reprint this article     Print this article  
    Send Feedback  
    Post a comment   Share  

  RELATED STORIES  

GALLERY
 

COURT IN TURMOIL. Court of Appeals Clerk of Court Teresita Marigomen reads the statement of the justices of the Court of Appeals following an executive session where they discussed the controversy arising from the decision to nullify a cease and desist order of the Securities and Exchange Commission on the election of the Meralco board, which GSIS general manager Winston Garcia had tried to stop. A justice has alleged he was offered P10 million to inhibit himself from the case. The appeals court has opted to refer the matter to the Supreme Court. Video taken by INQUIRER.net reporter Tetch Torres.

NAME NAMES. Sen Juan Ponce-Enrile says Court of Appeals Justice Jose Sabio Jr. to identify the businessman who alleged offered him a P10-million bribe to inhibit himself from the case filed by Meralco to nullify a CDO issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the power firm's conflict with GSIS general manager Winston Garcia. Enrile says heads must roll if the allegations are true. Video taken by INQUIRER.net reporter Veronica Uy.





imns



(UPDATE 2) CA seeks SC probe over P10-M bribe try

By Tetch Torres
INQUIRER.net
First Posted 10:18:00 07/31/2008

Filed Under: Judiciary (system of justice), Graft & Corruption

MANILA, Philippines -- The Court of Appeals will refer allegations of bribery raised by one of its justices to the Supreme Court for investigation, a court official said Thursday.

"After having discussed the issues, the Court of Appeals decided to refer the propriety of the actions of the justices concerned to the Supreme Court Office of the Court Administrator," lawyer Teresita Marigomen, clerk of court, said.

Reading from a statement of the appellate court after a closed-door en banc session, clerk of court Teresita Marigomen said that, aside from seeking the help of the high court, the justices also agreed to:

leave the ruling on the dispute between the Manila Electric Co. (Meralco) and the Government Service Insurance System (GSIS) to the ?parties concerned for appropriate action;? and
refer the conflict to its standing committee on the internal rules of court.

This would refer to the conflict between the two appellate court divisions over which of them had jurisdiction over the petition filed by Meralco, which had asked that a cease and desist order (CDO) issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) against the company?s board election -- a move that had favored the GSIS general manager, Winston Garcia, who had attempted a takeover of the private power company -- be voided.

The justices also appealed to everyone to respect their silence on the issue and refrain from public discussion of the case.

"We appeal to everyone to respect the subjudice nature of the case and refrain from public discussion of the case," Marigomen said.

At least 65 appellate court justices nationwide attended the session, including those from Cebu and Cagayn de Oro.

The controversy stemmed from allegations by Justice Jose Sabio Jr. of the 9th division that Meralco had offered him P10 million to inhibit himself from the case.

Meralco, in a statement, has denied Sabio?s allegation.

The 8th division of the appellate court, which eventually presided over the case, issued a decision voiding the SEC order.

Sabio and Justice Myrna Dimaranan-Vidal, also from the 9th Division, had protested the issuance of the July 23 decision on the Meralco petition, claiming the circumstances that surrounded the ruling were ?fishy.?

Sabio also questioned the ruling, saying it was supposed to be decided by the 9th division not the 8th.

Sabio and Vidal added that they had heard the oral arguments on the case but were not among those who signed the decision. With Sabio and Vidal in the ninth division was Associate Justice Vicente Roxas, who eventually penned the controversial ruling that favored Meralco.

But Roxas, in a statement, said that there was nothing irregular about how the case was moved to the eighth division, citing the court's reorganization due to the retirement of Justices Rodrigo Cosico, Lucenito Tagle, and Agustin Dizon.



Copyright 2014 INQUIRER.net. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


Share

RELATED STORIES:

OTHER STORIES:


  ^ Back to top

© Copyright 2001-2014 INQUIRER.net, An INQUIRER Company

The INQUIRER Network: HOME | NEWS | SPORTS | SHOWBIZ & STYLE | TECHNOLOGY | BUSINESS | OPINION | GLOBAL NATION | Site Map
Services: Advertise | Buy Content | Wireless | Newsletter | Low Graphics | Search / Archive | Article Index | Contact us
The INQUIRER Company: About the Inquirer | User Agreement | Link Policy | Privacy Policy

Advertisement
Megaworld
TAGAYTAY FONTAINE VILLAS
Radio on Inquirer.net
Inquirer VDO