Gadon: Court Administrator Marquez witnessed Sereno flew 'first class' | Inquirer News

Gadon: Court Administrator Marquez witnessed Sereno flew ‘first class’

First class or business class? Gadon says they're 'usually interchangeable'
/ 02:38 PM November 28, 2017

Lorenzo Gadon

Complainant Lorenzo Gadon attends the House of Representatives deliberation on impeachment of Chief Justice Ma. Lourdes Sereno on Thursday, Nov. 23, 2017. (File photo by LYN RILLON / Philippine Daily Inquirer)

Lawyer Lorenzo Gadon on Tuesday revealed that one of his witnesses that could testify that Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno, together with her staff and security, flew “first class” on her foreign travels was Court Administrator Jose Midas Marquez.

During the House justice committee’s deliberation on the probable cause to impeach Sereno, Gadon told the panel that he was having difficulty securing affidavits from some witnesses in his complaint against Sereno.

ADVERTISEMENT

When Misamis Occidental 2nd district Rep. Henry Oaminal asked Gadon to substantiate his claim about Sereno’s alleged lavish travels, Gadon said he has witnesses but they could not execute affidavits yet.

FEATURED STORIES

“I have witnesses… One of them, your honor, is Justice Midas (sic) who happened to be on the same plane and same flight with CJ. He was seated in the economy class while CJ, his security and staff are in business class and he can testify on this,” Gadon said.

Oaminal later corrected Gadon that Marquez was the Court Administrator and not a Justice. Marquez is one of the Supreme Court personnel the House panel summoned to testify in the hearings.

The lawmaker also argued that business class is different from flying first class.

“Court Administrator Midas testified that CJ was flying in a business class accommodation and not first class. So you agree with me that CJ, in her defense, did not fly in her foreign travels on a first class accommodation?” Oaminal asked Gadon.

But Gadon said: “Well, just because first class and business class are usually interchangeable.” Oaminal insisted that the two are different from each other. Gadon later submitted to Oaminal’s argument.

Oaminal then asked: “So you admit now that the CJ has not availed of a first class accommodation?”

ADVERTISEMENT

Gadon answered: “What I meant with first class was that it’s more expensive than economy, be it first or business class accommodation.”

In her verified answer, however, Sereno said that Gadon was apparently unaware that under the Supreme Court Human Resource Manual, the chief magistrate is expressly allowed to travel on “full business class, while the other members of the Court are not allowed to do so.”

Gadon, in his complaint, also said Sereno committed corruption when she “unnecessarily brings ‘huge entourage of lawyers’ in foreign trips.”

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Sereno’s camp denied this, saying she “brought only such number of lawyers as were necessary to assist her given the nature and objective of the official trip.” /je

TAGS: allegation, Business, first class, Gadon, Impeachment

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.