‘SC ruling could embolden Duterte to declare nationwide martial law’ | Inquirer News
INQUIRER.net

‘SC ruling could embolden Duterte to declare nationwide martial law’

/ 06:48 PM July 06, 2017

Albay Rep. Edcel Lagman and President Rodrigo Duterte. FILE PHOTOS

Albay Rep. Edcel Lagman on Thursday lamented the decision of the Supreme Court finding President Rodrigo Duterte’s martial law declaration valid, which rendered the high court powerless and which could embolden the President to declare martial rule nationwide.

In a statement, Lagman, a petitioner against martial law, said the Supreme Court decision rendered the magistrates powerless in reviewing the president’s exercise of martial law, as required for in the 1987 Constitution.

Article continues after this advertisement

Lagman said the Supreme Court gave too much leeway to the President to declare emergency powers simply because he had access to confidential information.

FEATURED STORIES

READ: Martial law an urgent measure for nation’s survival — SC

“This safeguard was denigrated by the majority decision which effectively deferred to the discretion of the President and gave him ‘much leeway and flexibility’ to declare martial law because it is he who has the arsenal of intelligence information to warrant such declaration,” Lagman said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“This disquisition virtually closes the door for the Supreme Court to fully review the sufficiency of the factual basis of the President’s exercise of extreme emergency powers,” he added.

Article continues after this advertisement

Lagman feared that the Supreme Court decision, in pronouncing that the martial law coverage is up to the President’s discretion, could “(pave) the way for an expanded territorial ambit of a martial law declaration.”

Article continues after this advertisement

FULL TEXT: SC decision upholding martial law in Mindanao

Lagman found “completely unnecessary” the portion of the decision, which reads: “Clearly, the Constitution grants the President the discretion to determine the territorial coverage of martial law and the suspension of the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus. He may put the entire Philippines or any part thereof under martial law.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Lagman said the Supreme Court decision could “embolden” Duterte to expand his martial law nationwide.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Martial law, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.