Pateros joins the fray: ‘Fort Bonifacio is ours’

A+
A
A-

Pateros also claims Fort Bonifacio, part of which has been developed into Bonfacio Global City (in picture).

A third party has joined the dispute over Fort Bonifacio.

“That’s our land they’re fighting over,” declared a former councilor of Pateros, who is leading the municipality’s claim to the Fort Bonifacio and other former military reservations in the area, after the Court of Appeals issued a decision awarding jurisdiction over the area to Makati City.

Dominador Rosales, who filed a petition in court last year claiming that Fort Bonifacio and its surrounding areas originally belonged to Pateros, said the Court of Appeals ruling would not affect the municipality’s claim lodged against the two cities at the Taguig City Regional Trial Court.

Fort Bonifacio is also being claimed by Makati and Taguig cities.

“Our case is very much alive at the Taguig RTC, and these two are separate cases. Whatever happens in the Taguig vs Makati case will not affect in anyway our case here,” Rosales, 71, told the Inquirer in an interview.

“Maybe the case will be advantageous to Pateros’ case because at the end of it, whoever wins the case will be the only opponent in our case. The defendants will be either one of them. Anyway, it’s our land they’re fighting over,” he added.

“Residents of Pateros were really saddened and disappointed at the news of the Court of Appeals ruling, but they shouldn’t be, because our case is still alive,” Rosales said.

However, he expressed concern as the case seemed to have stalled in court over two petitions filed separately by Makati and Taguig, which both asked the court to dismiss Pateros’ case.

The petition filed by Makati urged the court to dismiss, or suspend hearings of the case, because of the legal dispute between them and Taguig. For its part, Taguig asked the court to dismiss the case based on technicalities, saying the incorrect amount of docket fee was paid.

“In February this year, the court said it would decide on these petitions, but it’s been six months now, and we haven’t heard of a decision. So we’ll file a motion which will compel the court to decide on these petitions so the case can move on,” Rosales said.

In the civil case pending at the Taguig RTC Branch 271 under Presiding Judge Paz Esperanza Cortez, Pateros asked the court to declare the 461.56-hectare Fort Bonifacio area and the 304.45-hectare “enlisted men’s barrios” of Cembo, South Cembo, West Rembo, East Rembo, Comembo, Pembo and Pitogo as part of Pateros’ territory.

The petition also asked the court to compel Makati and Taguig to return to Pateros the revenues they collected over the years since Makati took over the barangay (villages) in 1986 and Fort Bonifacio was placed under Taguig’s jurisdiction in 1992.

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of INQUIRER.net. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94