SC fails to issue TRO on airtime limit rule

A+
A
A-

INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines—The Commission on Elections (Comelec) can still impose its new airtime limits on political advertisements after the Supreme Court deferred the issuance of a temporary restraining order against its implementation.

During the high court’s regular en banc (full court) session, the high court instead ordered the Comelec to comment on the petition filed by GMA7 and TV5.

GMA7, in its 56-page petition said Comelec Resolution No 9615 and its amendment Resolution No. 9631 are both “too restrictive.”

TV5, on the other hand said the new rule is “vague” because it failed to provide for a definite manner in which aggregation shall be made “thus making it difficult or impossible for media outlets to comply while subjecting them to possible criminal liability and loss of franchise permits.”

Under the rule, at the start of the campaign period which is Tuesday, (Feb. 12), all national candidates will have 120 minutes in all TV networks and 180 minutes in all radio stations. Local candidates, meanwhile, have 60 minutes in all TV networks and 90 minutes in all radio stations.

The two petitions have been consolidated by the high court and have been assigned to Associate Justice Diosdado Peralta.

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of INQUIRER.net. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

  • $5699914

    Gayahin na lang sana ng mg akandidato yung ginagawang kampanya ng mga tumatakbo sa plitika sa lugar ng Batanes….tahimik, magagalang at walang awayan….kapag talo, tinatanggap, kapag nanalo naman, mas nagpapakumbaba pa sa kalaban…

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_GEL5M676WZ7BLFR4SNH66WKRZM Bigboy I

    pera pera lang naman motibo ng mga tv networks kaya ginagawa nila to!

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94