Senate races to fortify Amla, drops provision on casinos
Pressure to ratify a bill strengthening the Anti-Money Laundering Act (Amla) at the soonest possible time has forced legislators to drop a provision requiring casinos to report the presence of suspected money launderers on their premises.
Sen. Teofisto “TG” Guingona III said “time is running out” for Congress to come out with amendments to Amla as required by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), a global group monitoring terrorist financing.
The Senate approved its set of Amla amendments on second and third readings on Monday night.
Congress needs to ratify the measure by Wednesday at the latest or risk inclusion in the FATF blacklist.
It was Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile who suggested the casino requirement, saying money launderers would sometimes pose as gamblers in efforts to launder illegally acquired cash.
The Amla amendment version passed by the House of Representatives does not contain a similar provision.
Guingona had predicted before the bicameral meeting began that the casino provision would spark disagreements between senators and House members tasked with reconciling their versions of the Amla amendment bill.
Rather than face a deadlock and miss the FATF’s deadline next week, the bicameral body chose to leave out the casino provision and proceeded to approve the rest of the amendments.
Guingona said the Philippines would face inclusion on the FATF blacklist should it fail to enact a new law on money laundering.
A blacklist could mean difficulties for overseas Filipinos sending money home as more documentation would be required from them as a result of the country’s blacklisting.
Guingona said though that the deletion of casinos from institutions covered by a requirement to report transactions of P500,000 and above would favor money launderers who choose to wash their illegally acquired cash in these establishments.
“That is the problem but it’s better to have a law than no law at all. Otherwise, we would end up in the blacklist,” he explained.
Guingona said the incoming 16th Congress would provide a new opportunity to amend the law once more and open debates on the inclusion of casinos.
The bill that still needs to be ratified by both Senate and House require:
— Foreign exchange dealers, money changers, remittance agents, preneed companies, and money and securities managers to report transactions of P500,000 and above to the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC).
— Dealers of precious metals and precious stones to report to the AMLC transactions of P1 million and above.
— Real estate agents to report transactions of P500,000 and above to the Land Registration Authority.
Also among the new provisions is one that allows the AMLC to request an ex parte (for one party) court order to freeze a suspected launderer’s bank accounts through the Office of the Solicitor General.
This means the court would no longer have to inform the depositor that his or her cash deposits would be frozen as he or she is being investigated by the AMLC.
The ex parte order also allows the AMLC to forfeit cash deposits and properties “having equivalent value to cash” of a suspected launderer whose acquisition of the assets was related “in any way to an unlawful activity or money-laundering offense.”
Other penalties include 7 to 14 years’ imprisonment and a fine not less than P3 million but does not exceed twice the value of the laundered assets.
Directors, officers or personnel who knowingly participated in the commission of money laundering would likewise be charged.
Get Inquirer updates while on the go, add us on these apps:
Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of INQUIRER.net. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94