Quantcast
pope ph

Court stops cutting of 486 trees by DPWH



ANGELES CITY—A court here has rescued 486 trees from being cut or transferred when it issued a 72-hour temporary environment protection order (Tepo) against a permit issued by Executive Secretary Paquito Ochoa Jr. for a road-widening project of the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) in Pampanga.

“The defendants, their subordinates and personnel and all persons acting under their control and supervision are enjoined from cutting, earth-balling or transferring the subject trees and/or other actions that will result in the prejudice of the subject trees along the stretch of MacArthur Highway in Angeles City and in the City of Mabalacat, Pampanga,” Executive Judge Omar Viola said in his order.

Viola, head of the regional trial court’s third judicial region here, issued the order at 5 p.m. on Monday, the same day leaders of Save the Trees Coalition (STC) filed a civil case to stop the tree cutting.

The STC leaders cited environmental, health and safety benefits to people for why they wanted the old trees, many of them 50 to 100 years old acacia, saved.

On Tuesday, Viola told the Inquirer that he sent Sheriff Claude Balasbas to serve a copy of the Tepo to Ochoa in Malacañang and to Public Works Secretary Rogelio Singson, Environment Secretary Ramon Paje and Environmental Management Bureau Central Luzon Director Lormelyn Claudio.

In a separate order, Judge Ma. Angelica Paras-Quiambao of the Regional Trial Court Branch 59, the environmental court here, summoned the defendants and set a hearing for the extension of the Tepo on Dec. 12, 13 and 14.

Francisco Yabut, STC lawyer, said that in those hearings, the DPWH should “manifest written proof that it is really canceling the cutting of trees along the Angeles and Mabalacat portions of the Manila North Road (MNR, also known as MacArthur Highway).” Tonette Orejas, Inquirer Central Luzon


Follow Us


Recent Stories:

Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Tags: News , Regions , trees


  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_GG4T5UNZ3P7SCHSRNJ7PF5JZMM Jimmy

    Eh kung kailangan talagang putulin dahil sa road widening ay bakit naman pipigilin..!!! Alin ba ang matimbang… yong ilang kahoy o yong para sa pag-unlad?  Sa ibang bansa ay maluwag ang karsada at mabilis ang daloy ng trafiko at mga kalakal..! Sa Pinas naman ay maraming kalakal at sasakyan pero makikitid ang mga karsada, kasing kitid ng pag-iisip ng ilang environmentalist kuno…!!!!

  • iping2sison

    I suggest that each of  complainants adopt a tree. The trees should be dug up, balled and transfer to complainants’ lots.  . 

  • delpillar

    These environmentalists are plain and simple hypocrites. modern-day equivalent of liberal hypocrites.
    They are doing things like this not to really care for the environment but for their self-consolation, self-satisfaction, self-enjoyment of being arseholes to government projeects. They want to be noted that they are brave and fighting for a cause but actually just a plain conceited who would just like to receive praises for their actions.

    They should go to the mountains like the one in CDO and in Compostela Valley to stop cutting of trees there.

    Road widening is the best contribution that a modern motorized society could ever give to the mother earth.

    Cars and vehicles that could not run more than 20-km per hour, or always stuck in the traffic will give more dangerous fumes to the atmosphere than the trees on the roadside could ever absorb. Trucks and buses that keep on changing the gear from PRIMERA to SEGUNDA CAMBIO and vice versa produced more NOx and SOx particles in the atmosphere.



Copyright © 2014, .
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement
Advertisement
Marketplace
Advertisement