Prosecution feels vindicated but won’t celebrate ‘until fat lady sings’
More News from Cynthia D. Balana
The prosecution panel on Tuesday said the Senate impeachment court’s denial of the defense motion to suppress the evidence on the Philippine Savings Bank deposits of Chief Justice Renato Corona was a “welcome development” in their fight to remove him from his post.
“We are moving close to our objectives which are the search for the truth and to exact public accountability,” Iloilo Representative Niel Tupas Jr., the lead prosecutor, said in a text message to the Philippine Daily Inquirer.
Tupas said the prosecution also felt “relieved” by the decision of the impeachment court to just admonish a private counsel, Vitaliano Aguirre II, for covering his ears when Senator-Judge Miriam Defensor-Santiago was talking.
He said both decisions were a “good sign” for the prosecution as it was preparing for the defense’s presentation of evidence next week.
Bayan Muna Representative Neri Javier Colmenares, another prosecutor, said the prosecutors were vindicated by the impeachment court when it denied the motion to suppress evidence.
This, he said, only meant that the Senate did not err in issuing the subpoena on Corona’s bank accounts, and that it was wrong for the defense to label this as an illegal act and therefore, inadmissible in court.
Colmenares said Corona should focus on presenting evidence to counter the prosecution’s evidence rather than seeking to suppress that were damaging to him. “We are now shifting in full gear in preparation for the defense presentation next week,” he said.
Colmenares said the prosecution was eagerly awaiting the decision of the impeachment court on its order to the defense to show cause why it should not be held in contempt for holding a press conference and charging the senators of being bribed by Malacañang with P100 million to favor the prosecution.
Marikina Representative Romero Quimbo, the prosecution’s spokesperson, said the Senate’s unanimous decision to accept the PSBank documents only proved that it was far more important to accept evidence than to exclude.
“Accepting evidence only strengthens whatever verdict it will render later on so we strongly congratulate the Senate,” Quimbo said.
Asked if the prosecution felt victorious with the Senate’s twin decisions, he said: “I think we all learned our lessons, but we don’t celebrate until the fat lady sings.”
Get Inquirer updates while on the go, add us on these apps:
Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of INQUIRER.net. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94