Quantcast
Latest Stories

House panel defends disclosure on Corona condo

By

MANILA, Philippines—The House of Representatives’ 11-man panel that will serve as prosecutors at the impeachment trial of Chief Justice Renato Corona said it was not trying to preempt the Senate when it disclosed to the public a piece of evidence against the accused.

Iloilo Rep. Niel Tupas Jr., chief prosecutor, said the trial has not formally commenced yet so there was no violation of the sub judice rule of the Senate was committed.

“How can the action of the House prosecution preempt the impeachment trial when there is even no entry of appearance yet by the House prosecutors before the Senate?” Tupas told the INQUIRER.

On Tuesday, the panel of lawmakers presented a document concerning a 303.5- square meter penthouse unit at the plush The Bellagio in The Fort, Taguig City allegedly purchased by the beleaguered Chief Justice and his wife Cristina on Dec. 16, 2009 from Megaworld properties for P14.51 million. The unit has three parking slots, each measuring 12.5 sq m.

Tupas said the formalities of the Senate calling and accepting the House panel is set on Jan. 16 and that there was even a motion from the defense to set a date for a preliminary hearing on the motion to dismiss the impeachment complaint based on a technicality.

“Also, the House has not even received a notice for a pre-trial conference so how could the House preempt the impeachment? We never touched on the merits of the case. We only stated a fact as alleged in the complaint,” he stressed.

Bayan Muna party-list Rep. Neri Javier Colmenares, another prosecutor, said all parties, including the Corona camp, recognized that the trial has not started by asking for a preliminary hearing.

“Congressman Tupas merely said something about the evidence, which is a piece of property. He did not talk about the merits of the case so it was not a violation,” Colmenares said.

“And if ever he did talk about the merits, the trial has not even started,” he stressed.

Colmenares said he had confidence in the Senate that it will not be swayed by the public opinion generated by such a disclosure of evidence.

Marikina Rep. Romero “Miro” Quimbo, the panel’s spokesperson and a former trial lawyer, said in a news briefing that the rule on public disclosures on merits of the case does not apply at the moment.

“It does not apply because the public prosecutors have not entered their appearances yet. That will be done on the 16th (of January) as stated by the Senate so that rule does not apply at the moment,” he said.

He rejected the insinuation that the disclosure of the evidence before the trial was meant to mould public opinion in favor of the prosecution.

“The impeachment is a process that affects every single individual as the case was betrayal of public trust,” Quimbo later told the INQUIRER.

“We, therefore, believe that it is the duty of the prosecution to always inform, update the public of what’s going on otherwise we will be remiss in our duties,” he said.


Follow Us

Follow us on Facebook Follow on Twitter Follow on Twitter


Recent Stories:

Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Tags: Chief Justice Renato Corona , Corona impeachment trial , House of Representatives’ 11-man panel , Iloilo Rep. Niel Tupas Jr.

  • Green_Latern

    The 10-page resolution, signed by Overall Deputy Ombudsman Orlando Casimiro last Wednesday, said the older Tupas’ motion was denied “due to lack of merit.”

    The former governor’s graft case stemmed from his allegedly anomalous approval of a mining permit for construction materials to be used for an airport even though the supplier, who is allegedly associated with his daughter-in-law, supposedly did not have technical capability to handle such a project.

    In April last year, the Office of the Ombudsman found probable cause to file criminal charges against then Gov. Tupas for violation of Section 3 of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act (Republic Act 3019).

    The older Tupas filed a motion for reconsideration in May 2010 arguing that he did not “unilaterally” sign the mining permit, but the Office of the Ombudsman said in its resolution that “there is no doubt that he was the one who issued the permit.”

    • raflaydo

      What is the connection of Green_Latern’s comment to the article?  A little LOGIC here, pls!!!!

      • sacrebleau

        I think he’s trying to launch a counter propaganda campaign but it’s backfiring, making him look like a fool.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NVTCJLT6TF3ZDZCP6MMI6NDMYA Alfonso D

        Neil Tupas Jr is trying to portray as a righteous man. Green_Latern exposed the dark side of his father. Is this what they call “like father like son”?

      • Green_Latern

        If you don’t think you’ll not get the LOGIC :)

    • Coolegleg

      at Green_Lantern
      (have posted in other forum similar response to his identical posting)
      So what if the OLDER tupas will be shot or hanged or castrated????  Who cares???

      I don’t discount that there are questions on younger tupas’ motives but it has no significance in this forum.

      Let’s limit our dicsussions on things relevant to CJ Corona’s case….

  • frankpar

    If Tupas jun. will help Npy to oust Corons, Tupas sen. wiil get a lot of advantages in his corruotion case. Payback from Malacanang viw straight path.

  • frankpar

    Question:
    What that stupids want? The SALN rulr Corona used like other justices stems from the time back to Mama Cory’s rule. Can it be bad, Noy?
    Answer:
    Anything what my enemies are doing is always bad, no matter it is legal or not. Because I know all better and not all what is legal is also good, esp. if my enemies do it. Basta.

  • pedronimo

    The truth shall not make Corona free but guilty…and beyond reasonable doubt,

  • 1mainstream2

    the better informed the nation on this political exercise of impeachment, the better
    it would be for the senator judges when they weigh everything before that make a
    determination / ruling on the case. it is case of the filipinos against the CJ and it is
    the filipinos who are the party of interest so why limit the informations especially
    info’s imbued with public interest. this is precisely the reason there is a constitutional
    provision regarding public’s right to know to be able exact accountabilty on
    govt. offficials. senate rules can never supplant a constitutional provision.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2N5J5J6W3LNNWVBYXFQANX3N6Y Gregg

    “soveriengty resides in the people and all government authority resides therein”… ergo, the people should therefore be rightfully informed what is all about re:CJ Corona’s assets, what are all his assets, how did he amass all those assets and would he really be capable to amass all those assets given his decent income as Associate Justice of the SC… the people/public are entitled to be informed… Mr. Senators and Clergy please don’t pretend to be more poppish than the Pope… In ilokano no adda kalkallubam nga naangot adadda pay nga sumngaw ti buyok na isu nga ittata pay laeng ibuyakyak yon tapno malpasen boksing…awanen ti impeachment ten ta maobligar nga agresignen ngem dayta naibuyakyak amin dagiti naglablabsingan na….

  • Atlason

    Tupas and his Malacanang minions are obviously grandstanding and wants to engage in trial by publicity, it’s that simple notwithstanding whatever excuse they want to peddle to the public. They want to please their patron in Malacanang so they can get their pork barrel at magpakasasa sa kaban ng bayan. 



Copyright © 2013, .
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement

News

  • MILF: Team PNoy win good for peace
  • Benguet town tests Aquino’s order on mining
  • 3-page deal ends strike at Laguna soda bottling plant
  • Aquino help sought vs Cagayan violence
  • NPA rebels free 12 hostages taken in separate attacks
  • Sports

  • Lady Eagles seize Game 1 in 3
  • Azkals call off Kyrgyzstan friendly
  • Caluscusin top rhythmic gymnast with 3 golds
  • Big Chill rounds out D-League semis cast
  • Gilas-PH ‘better off sans injured Abueva’
  • Lifestyle

  • Yellow chicken fast gaining popularity at Wee Nam Kee
  • Chicken mangosteen curry, papaya salad, soft-shell crabs–Thai cuisine reworked for the Filipino palate
  • ‘Turon’ with ‘panocha’
  • Uncommon curry in a Japanese resto
  • Lucban, after Pahiyas: The divine tastes remain
  • Entertainment

  • Graphic gay sex stirs controversy at Cannes
  • New show will have ‘Party Pilipinas’ team
  • Bella Flores Foundation planned
  • A heady dose of indie rock, fashion at Wanderland fest
  • Kapatid wishes Willie well
  • Business

  • Coke workers’ strike ends in amicable settlement
  • Lenovo says quarterly profit up 90 percent
  • Switzerland eyes law on frozen dictator funds
  • Survey shows China manufacturing contracting
  • AirAsia net profit falls nearly 40% in 1st quarter
  • Technology

  • Media watchdog criticizes UAE over tweeter’s jail term
  • Twitter tightens security after high-profile breaches
  • Risky behavior starts young on web—survey
  • Office bullying video sparks outcry in Singapore
  • Poll: Teens migrating to Twitter
  • Opinion

  • Editorial cartoon, May 24, 2013
  • Out of the doldrums
  • Fighting over champagne
  • The poor didn’t benefit
  • Post-op
  • Global Nation

  • Pope Francis may visit Philippines in 2016—CBCP
  • Asia tension could lead to conflict—DFA chief
  • DOT seeks new markets for Boracay after Taiwan tourists cancel bookings
  • CA stops PH-Japanese contract to develop Nampeidai property in Tokyo
  • Brown hounded for calling Manila ‘gates of hell’
  • Marketplace
    Advertisement
    Azure Skin Ad
    Azure Skin Ad
    © Copyright 1997-2013 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved