Duterte is not Arroyo; Lacson 'pork' warning misplaced — Diokno | Inquirer News

Duterte is not Arroyo; Lacson ‘pork’ warning misplaced — Diokno

By: - Reporter / @NCorralesINQ
/ 03:52 PM August 14, 2018

Benjamin Diokno

Budget Secretary Benjamin Diokno talks about the 2019 national budget, federalism and government disbursement during the Meet Inquirer Multimedia Forum at the Inquirer headquarters in Makati City. INQUIRER.net / NESTOR CORRALES

Budget Secretary Benjamin Diokno on Tuesday said Sen. Panfilo Lacson’s fear of the “pork barrel” system coming back was “misplaced,” after House Speaker Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo said no congressman would receive a zero budget.

Diokno said President Rodrigo Duterte has a “strong” anti-corruption drive and assured the public that the cash-based P3.757-trillon national budget for 2019 was “pork-free.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Arroyo, who is barely a month into being the new Speaker, earlier said all House members would receive allocations despite their political affiliation.

FEATURED STORIES

Lacson raised fears that this move would signal the return of the pork barrel system or the Priority Development Assistance Fund or pork barrel, which the Supreme Court ruled as unconstitutional.

READ: Pork barrel is unconstitutional, Lacson reminds Arroyo

But Diokno allayed the fear of the senator.

“President Duterte is not GMA. Okay? And he is very strong in [his] anti-corruption [campaign]. So the fear of Senator Lacson is misplaced,” the budget chief said during the Meet Inquirer Multimedia forum at the Philippine Daily Inquirer Headquarters in Makati City.

Diokno said “the President has instructed us not to have zero allocation.”

“So there will be no zero allocation,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Asked if these could be considered as “hidden pork,” he answered, “No, these are projects that are supposed to benefit residents of those districts. They are not pork. They are not pork. Call it any other name but not pork.”

He said the national budget of the Duterte administration has been “consistent with the Supreme Court decisions on Disbursement Acceleration Program (DAP).”

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The Supreme Court in 2015 affirmed the unconstitutionality of DAP. /je

TAGS: allocation, Arroyo, budget, Diokno, favors of office, Lacson, Rodrigo Duterte

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.