Sans AMLC help, Duterte probe ends | Inquirer News

Sans AMLC help, Duterte probe ends

/ 07:30 AM February 16, 2018

The refusal of the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) to cooperate prompted the Office of the Ombudsman to terminate its investigation of President Duterte’s allegedly unexplained wealth.

Breaking its silence two days after Solicitor General Jose Calida made public the termination of the probe, the Ombudsman on Thursday said, however, that a “closed and terminated field investigation is without prejudice to the refiling of a complaint with new or additional evidence.”

Calida, on Tuesday, made public a letter dated Feb. 12 from Overall Deputy Ombudsman Arthur Carandang saying, that the termination of the probe on Sen. Antonio Trillanes’ plunder complaint against Mr. Duterte had been approved by Deputy Ombudsman Cyril Ramos on Nov. 29.

Article continues after this advertisement

Evidence stage

FEATURED STORIES

The fact-finding, or field investigation, stage is when Ombudsman investigators gather evidence on a complaint of wrongdoing by a government official.

That the probe was terminated in the fact-finding stage, meant there was not enough evidence to pursue Trillanes’ complaint.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Ombudsman, in a statement, said the probe hit a dead end “after the AMLC declined to provide a report or confirmation on the requested vital data.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Carandang, last Sept. 26, admitted to the Inquirer the absence of a final AMLC report on Mr. Duterte’s bank accounts.

Article continues after this advertisement

Much of the statement released by the Ombudsman on Thursday, was devoted to defending the office’s refusal to be transparent about the results of its fact-finding investigations.

Secrecy

Article continues after this advertisement

Calida, on Tuesday, questioned why the Ombudsman failed to publicly disclose the probe’s termination. “Why withhold this information from the Filipino people?” Calida said.

The Ombudsman said it was “not obliged to inform the subject [Mr. Duterte] of the fact-finding investigation about its outcome.”

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

But the Ombudsman said Calida, by writing to Carandang on Feb. 8 to inquire about the status of the probe, effectively recognized that Malacañang’s Jan. 29 order to suspend Carandang was “unconstitutional.”

TAGS: Rodrigo Duterte

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.