Lagman: Delay in martial law reso to preempt SC challenge | Inquirer News

Lagman: Delay in martial law reso to preempt SC challenge

By: - Reporter / @deejayapINQ
/ 07:07 AM December 24, 2017

The delay in the processing of the joint resolution of Congress extending martial law in Mindanao by one year could be “deliberate and premeditated” to foil plans to challenge its constitutionality, a House opposition leader said on Saturday.

A day after calling attention to the delayed preparation and enrollment of the congressional document, Albay Rep. Edcel Lagman said there could be more to the issue, considering a number of dissenters were planning to question the martial law extension before the Supreme Court.

“The patent design is to deprive challengers of the extension from attaching in their petitions before the Supreme Court the required certified true copy of the enrolled joint resolution,” he said in a statement.

Article continues after this advertisement

“As the delay progresses, aggravated by the ensuing holidays, the effectivity of the extension on Jan. 1 will soon set in,” he added.

“Once the extension becomes effective, any petition or prayer for the issuance of a temporary restraining order or a writ of preliminary injunction may be mooted,” said Lagman, a leader of the Magnificent Seven bloc.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Congress, Edcel Lagman, Martial law, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.