Ombudsman suspends Pangasinan mayor, vice mayor for printing names, faces on ambulance | Inquirer News

Ombudsman suspends Pangasinan mayor, vice mayor for printing names, faces on ambulance

/ 04:59 PM December 14, 2017

LINGAYEN, PANGASINAN—For printing their pictures and names on the town’s ambulance, the mayor and vice mayor of Asingan town in Pangasinan province were meted a one-year suspension each by the Office of the Ombudsman.

In a seven-page decision signed by Ombudsman Conchita Carpio-Morales on Oct. 13, Asingan Mayor Heidee Chua and Vice Mayor Carlos Lopez Jr. were penalized for conduct prejudicial to the best interest of the service, simple misconduct and violation of the Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees.

Chua and Lopez could not be immediately reached for comment.

Article continues after this advertisement

The case stemmed from a complaint filed by Asingan Councilor Evangeline Dorao on Nov. 4, 2016, who said they violated a Sept. 23, 2010 memorandum circular of the Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG) banning the placement of the names or initials and pictures of government officials on billboards and signs of government programs, projects and properties.

FEATURED STORIES

Dorao said she had reminded Chua and Lopez of the prohibition in two letters she sent them in October last year but said she did not receive any reply.

In their joint counter-affidavit, Chua and Lopez said they immediately acted on Dorao’s letters by removing their pictures and names from the ambulance on the first week of November.

Article continues after this advertisement

They also said they did not use government funds for the printing of their pictures and stickers as certified by the town’s budget officer, accountant and treasurer.

Article continues after this advertisement

In its ruling, the Ombudsman said Chua and Lopez could not be penalized for grave misconduct because there was no evidence that their action was tainted with corruption or a clear intent to disregard an established rule.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Ombudsman also said Chua and Lopez were not guilty of grave abuse of authority because there was no proof that there was excessive use of their authority.

But the Ombudsman said Chua and Lopez were also administratively liable for not answering Dorao’s letters, which was a violation of a provision of the Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Ombudsman has directed the DILG to implement its decision. Gabriel CardinozaINQ

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS:

No tags found for this post.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.