Voluminous records, staff changes lead to delays in Dichaves case | Inquirer News

Voluminous records, staff changes lead to delays in Dichaves case

/ 12:52 AM June 05, 2017

The sheer volume of records and the fact that former President Joseph Estrada’s original prosecutors have moved on elsewhere have slowed down progress on the case of his alleged dummy, Jaime Dichaves.

Dichaves has yet to be ordered arrested for the nonbailable plunder case. His camp, led by Estrada’s former defense lawyer Estelito Mendoza, wants to know first which evidence served as the basis for a finding of probable cause to try him.

Before the Sandiganbayan Seventh Division could resolve Dichaves’ motion, the court, on April 11, gave the Ombudsman’s Office of the Special Prosecutor 30 days to submit its comment or opposition.

Article continues after this advertisement

The prosecution, however, still could not answer Dichaves’ plea. After being granted a 20-day extension, the OSP sought another 20 days to come up with its response with the court agreeing to extend the deadline to June 20.

FEATURED STORIES

In its latest motion for extension, the OSP again cited the “volume of the records of the case which the handling prosecutors need to peruse.”

But, the motion also pointed out that “none of the members of the present prosecution team was part of or involved with the original Team that prosecuted the case” and won the resigned president’s conviction for plunder.

Article continues after this advertisement

“All of the former prosecutors are no longer connected with the Office of the Special Prosecutor,” the motion stated.

Article continues after this advertisement

The OSP added that it also felt the need to prepare a table of contents and paginate each folder to better facilitate the proceedings.

Article continues after this advertisement

It may be recalled that during an April 11 hearing, Assistant State Prosecutor Loreto Cunanan told the open court that the plunder case had long been decided against Estrada and the prosecution’s efforts have been sustained since. He hinted that this showed a finding of probable cause against Dichaves, who had, so far, never faced the court.

Cunanan, however, said that he had yet to see the records personally because they had been already archived.

Article continues after this advertisement

Dichaves claims to be the true owner of the Jose Velarde bank account at Equitable-PCI Bank. Prosecutors alleged that Estrada conspired with the businessman to use the account to stash P3.23 billion in ill-gotten wealth—including commissions from the government’s purchase of shares from leisure firm Belle Corp.

Dichaves, however, could not be tried alongside Estrada in Criminal Case No. 26558 as he slipped out of the country by the time the Sandiganbayan first ordered his arrest on Jan. 29, 2002.

He returned only on Nov. 19, 2010, three years after the former president was convicted for plunder in September 2007 but pardoned six weeks later. (Estrada placed second in the 2010 presidential elections and has been elected Manila mayor twice, in 2013 and 2016).

The Sandiganbayan proceedings only recently resumed after the Supreme Court, in December, lifted a three-year temporary restraining order and upheld the validity of the Ombudsman’s 2011 reinvestigation of the case.

Mendoza invoked the constitutional right of the accused to be informed of the nature of allegations as part of due process in Dichaves’s case.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

This was the same tactic he employed in the pork barrel scam cases of former Senators Juan Ponce Enrile and Ramon Revilla Jr., although the legal heavyweight was arguably more successful in the senior senator’s case.

TAGS: Sandiganbayan

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.