Pimentel: Ombudsman must first act on Villanueva appeal | Inquirer News

Pimentel: Ombudsman must first act on Villanueva appeal

By: - Reporter / @MAgerINQ
/ 11:39 AM November 14, 2016

Aquilino Koko Pimentel

Senate President Aquilino “Koko” Pimentel III. INQUIRER FILE

The Ombudsman must act first on a motion for reconsideration (MR) filed by Senator Joel Villanueva before the Senate could act on the dismissal order against him, Senate President Aquilino “Koko” Pimentel III said on Monday.

Pimentel said he was informed that Villanueva had already filed an MR before the Office of the Ombudsman.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: Sen. Villanueva ordered dismissed from public service over ‘pork’

FEATURED STORIES

“Hence, the Ombudsman must act on that first before I act on the Ombudsman’s letter to me,” he said in a text message to reporters.

“Although I would follow the “better” procedure which is to refer the Ombudsman letter to the rules committee,” the Senate leader added.

Article continues after this advertisement

The rules committee in the Senate is headed by Senate Majority Leader Vicente “Tito” Sotto III.

Article continues after this advertisement

Pimentel was reacting to the dismissal order issued by Ombudsman Conchita Carpio-Morales against Villanueva for the allegedly anomalous use of P10 million pork barrel allocation when the latter was still a congressman.

Villanueva has repeatedly denied the allegations, saying he did not receive the amount. CBB/rga

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Conchita Carpio-Morales, Emmanuel Joel Villanueva, News, Ombudsman, Senate

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.