De Lima on House justice body report: A sham conclusion | Inquirer News

De Lima on House justice body report: A sham conclusion

By: - Reporter / @MAgerINQ
/ 03:44 PM October 19, 2016

Senator Leila de Lima speaks at a mass for Option for Life at the CBCP Chapel in Manila on Monday, October 10, 2016 in celebration of the World Day Against Death Penalty. GRIG C. MONTEGRANDE/Philippine Daily Inquirer

Senator Leila de Lima. GRIG C. MONTEGRANDE/INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

A “sham” conclusion.

This was how Senator Leila de Lima described on Wednesday the findings of the House of Representatives committee on justice that all pieces of evidence pointed to her alleged involvement in the proliferation of the illegal drug trade at the New Bilibid Prison when she was still Justice Secretary.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Meaning, the lies are sufficient? What evidence are they talking about?” De Lima said when told that the panel supposedly found sufficient evidence against her.

FEATURED STORIES

She said the convicted felons, who testified against her in the House inquiry, were “lying,” and “perjured” witnesses.

“And when they say that okay we’re not recommending the prosecution of Senator de Lima, we’re just asking na lang the DOJ (Department of Justice) to undertake further investigation, that means they are practically telling the DOJ to invent pa more, invent pa more lies,” the senator.

Article continues after this advertisement

“If they believe that the evidence are sufficient, then they should recommend for my prosecution so ano yan (what is that)?” she said.

Article continues after this advertisement

While saying that all the evidence pointed to De Lima’s involvement and possible accountability in the illegal drug trade, the House panel decided to just leave it up to the DOJ or the Ombudsman to determine the appropriate charges that should be filed against her.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: House justice body: Bilibid drugs flourished under De Lima’s watch

The senator said this decision of the panel only showed that there was no evidence against her.

“Now they are saying there is sufficient evidence but they are not recommending prosecution. So that’s ironic, that’s a self contradictory,” De Lima said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“It’s a sham conclusion,” she added. RAM

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Drug Trade, report

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.