Palace on martial law: Have no fear | Inquirer News

Palace on martial law: Have no fear

/ 05:46 AM August 12, 2016

There is no reason to fear that President Duterte will declare martial law, Malacañang assured the people on Thursday.

Presidential spokesperson Ernesto Abella said Mr. Duterte wants to accomplish all his plans for the country without resorting to authoritarian rule.

Abella was reacting to concerns raised by a remark the President made in response to a letter from Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno.

Article continues after this advertisement

“There is no need to worry about martial law. As President Duterte said, ‘I want to make specific changes without having to do martial law,’” Abella said in a press briefing.

FEATURED STORIES

Mr. Duterte had mentioned martial law as he raged against Sereno, who in the letter had expressed concern about a possible constitutional crisis after the President linked several judges to illegal drugs.

Sereno said only the Supreme Court could discipline members of the judiciary.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Please don’t order me around, I’m not a fool. If this continues, with you trying to stop me, I might lose my cool, or would you rather that I declare martial law?” a fuming President had said on Tuesday in reply to Sereno, as he addressed a division of Philippine Army soldiers.

Article continues after this advertisement

The President’s chief legal counsel, Salvador Panelo, on Thursday defended his own previous day’s explanation that martial law may be warranted if the drug menace escalated.

Article continues after this advertisement

His explanation had drawn flak, particularly from Senate President Franklin Drilon, who pointed out that under the 1987 Constitution, martial law may be declared only in case of invasion or rebellion, or when the public safety requires it.

Panelo said the operative provision was “when public safety requires it.”

Article continues after this advertisement

He clarified that what he meant was the country’s situation was “akin to an invasion or rebellion because the public safety is imminently in danger.”

“Therefore, we cannot be chained into literally reading the constitutional provision as it expresses itself, like invasion or rebellion,” he told reporters.

Panelo said people must look at whether or not the situation requires a declaration of martial law because the safety of the country is at stake.

The Constitution must not be read superficially, he added, pointing out there had been instances when the high tribunal did not read the Constitution literally.

“Mr. Drilon, this is the Duterte Constitution, which is actually the 1987 Constitution. Read it with depth, not superficially,” he said.

Abella also noted that the emergency powers being sought in the Senate for President Duterte would not be absolute but would be limited only to traffic matters.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“We can trust that the President will not go beyond [this],” he said.

TAGS: Martial law, Nation, News

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.