SC junks 2nd plea vs Grace Poe ruling | Inquirer News

SC junks 2nd plea vs Grace Poe ruling

By: - Reporter / @TarraINQ
/ 12:41 AM April 20, 2016

INQUIRER FILE PHOTO / RICHARD A. REYES

INQUIRER FILE PHOTO / RICHARD A. REYES

BAGUIO CITY—The Supreme Court (SC) has dismissed the second bid to overturn its ruling allowing Sen. Grace Poe to run for President, saying the plea lacks merit and is prohibited under court rules.

In its last summer session here, the high court en banc also ordered the plea “expunged from the records of this case.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“The court denied the second motion for reconsideration filed by petitioner Francisco Tatad, through counsel, for lack of merit and for being a prohibited pleading under the rules,” court spokesperson Theodore Te told a press briefing.

FEATURED STORIES

Tatad, through his lawyer Manuelito Luna, had filed the second reconsideration plea, unfazed by the 9-6 ruling where the high court decided to void the Commission on Elections’ (Comelec) resolutions canceling Poe’s certificate of candidacy (COC).

Tatad made the plea even while the court had said in affirming its ruling on the Poe case on April 5 that “no further pleadings or motions will be entertained,” putting a final lid on the litigation that began in December.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Rules of Court prohibits the filing of second and subsequent motions for reconsideration, citing the legal principle that a ruling must become final and litigation must end at some point.

Article continues after this advertisement

But Luna pushed ahead with filing the pleading on April 11, invoking Section 3, Rule 15 of the Internal Rules of the Supreme Court.  The provision grants an exception to the bar on further reconsideration pleas “in the higher interest of justice,” and if allowed “by the Court en banc upon a vote of at least two-thirds of its actual membership.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The lawyer lamented the ruling, but said he was not surprised.

“No amount of legal maneuvering can change the fact that the majority committed a grave abuse of discretion and dishonored the Constitution. We’re sure history will judge the majority rather harshly,” said Luna.

Article continues after this advertisement

The ruling also came as expected to Poe’s lawyer George Garcia.

“[It was] … unprocedural and there was already a warning from the Supreme Court. It’s now up to the people. Let [their] will be done,” he said in a text message.

The high court had upheld with finality its ruling allowing Poe’s presidential bid, with the majority finding that the Comelec had committed grave abuse of discretion in canceling her COC.

Seven of the magistrates also upheld Poe’s natural-born citizenship and 10-year residency in the Philippines, affirming in separate votes her qualifications as a presidential candidate.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The vote defeated a minority who voted against Poe’s qualifications, with three magistrates abstaining from the vote on the citizenship issue, and two on the residency issue.

TAGS: Grace Poe, Nation, News, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.