Court gives go signal to Binay damage suit | Inquirer News

Court gives go signal to Binay damage suit

/ 05:13 AM January 15, 2016

A Makati court has declared that Vice President Jejomar Binay has “a valid cause of action” in the P200-million damage suit he filed against Senators Alan Peter Cayetano and Antonio Trillanes IV, Ombudsman Conchita Carpio Morales and The Philippine Daily Inquirer, for their allegedly concerted efforts to malign his character and destroy his chances of becoming President.

In a 40-page omnibus order released by Judge Elpidio Calis on  Jan. 5, the court said it found Binay’s complaint “sufficiently states a cause of action,” thus denying the motions to dismiss filed by the defendants, describing them as “improper.”

It also explained that by “stating a cause of action,” Binay’s complaint will be heard for the parties to be able to present their evidence.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The claiming party has the obligation to offer evidence to support the allegations constituting the elements of his cause of action. Thus, this court believes that a full-blown trial is necessary,” read the order.

FEATURED STORIES

Binay filed the suit in July 2015, accusing his critics of “orchestrated persecution,” of which the defendants all played their roles, to “malign and discredit the [Vice President] before the public for the upcoming 2016 elections,” accusing Binay of graft, corruption and other illegal activities to accumulate alleged ill-gotten wealth.

Also among the 13 defendants, who are being held liable for libel and violation of Articles 20, 21, 2176 of the Civil Code of the Philippines, are former Makati Vice Mayor Ernesto Mercado, Caloocan Rep. Edgar Erice, whistle-blowers Mario Hechanova and Renato Bondal, Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas Governor Amando Tetangco Jr. and Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) Deputy Director Julia Bacay-Abad.

Article continues after this advertisement

Binay asked for P100 million in moral damages and another P100 million in exemplary damages. In addition, he asked that the defendants be ordered to pay P1 million for his lawyer’s fees and litigation expenses.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The omnibus order clearly belies the contention of the defendants that VP Binay’s damage suit is merely a harassment case,” said Binay’s lawyer, Claro Certeza, in a statement.

Article continues after this advertisement

He said Binay can finally prove that all the proceedings conducted by his political detractors “were all designed simply to destroy his presidential bid.”

The Makati court also said that Tetangco and AMLC officials cannot use government lawyers to represent them in the case since they are being sued in their personal and not official capacities.

Article continues after this advertisement

Calis has set the judicial dispute resolution of the case for Jan. 29 at 10 a.m.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS:

No tags found for this post.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.