De Lima to Kid Peña: Abide by Court of Appeals status quo order | Inquirer News

De Lima to Kid Peña: Abide by Court of Appeals status quo order

/ 08:18 PM April 10, 2015

Justice Secretary Leila de Lima has advised Makati Vice Mayor Romulo “Kid” Peña to abide by the order of the Court of Appeals that a status quo prior to the suspension of Makati Mayor Jejomar Erwin “Junjun” Binay should be observed.

Binay was suspended for six months by the Office of the Ombudsman due to his alleged involvement in the construction of the overpriced Makati Parking Building.

He went to the Court of Appeals to stop the implementation of the suspension order. The appeals court issued a temporary restraining order but De Lima together with the Department of Interior and Local Government (DILG) and the Office of the Ombudsman claimed it was moot and academic since the suspension had been served and Peña had taken his oath as acting mayor.

Article continues after this advertisement

The appeals court then issued a writ of preliminary injunction telling DILG and the Ombudsman to respect their decision and observe a status quo prior to the issuance of the suspension order.

FEATURED STORIES

Peña earlier said he would continue to exercise his duties as acting mayor until the Supreme Court ruled with finality on the case.

“The Court of Appeals clarified the scope of the injunction … so, strictly speaking, kailangan na sigurong sundin muna ‘yun while the Supreme Court is hearing the Ombudsman’s petition,” De Lima said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Ombudsman Conchita Carpio Morales went to the Supreme Court asking that it nullify the restraining order issued by the Court of Appeals.

The high court has set an oral argument on the case next week during its summer session in Baguio. RC

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Court of Appeals, Ombudsman, Oral argument

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.