Purisima didn’t commit usurpation of authority—lawyer | Inquirer News

Purisima didn’t commit usurpation of authority—lawyer

/ 06:30 PM March 17, 2015

Purisima

Resigned PNP chief Alan Purisima. RAFFY LERMA/INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines—Resigned Philippine National Police chief Director General Alan Purisima did not commit usurpation of authority, his camp maintained on Tuesday.

Reacting to the Senate’s joint committee report on the Mamasapano debacle, Purisima’s lawyer disagreed with the findings of the Senate, particularly Purisima committing the violation for participating in “Oplan Exodus,” even giving orders to Police Director Getulio Napeñas despite his suspension.

Article continues after this advertisement

“We will study the draft committee report once it is made public. We, however, take exception to the finding that PDG Purisima committed usurpation of authority or official functions,” Lawyer Kristoffer James Purisima said in a statement.

FEATURED STORIES

Purisima disputed claims that his client performed official duties and functions while serving his suspension from the Office of the Ombudsman over corruption allegations.

“At no time since his preventive suspension did PDG Purisima perform official duties and functions. Neither did he misrepresent or falsely represent himself as the Chief PNP under pretense of official position,” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Purisima gave orders to Napeñas, then Special Action Force commander, during the planning and execution of “Oplan Exodus”—the covert operation that led to the killing of 44 policemen, 18 Moro Islamic Liberation Front fighters and five civilians.

Article continues after this advertisement

Earlier reports said President Benigno Aquino III, mindful of Purisima’s suspension, dealt with Purisima who provided the intelligence information on international terrorists Zulkifli Bin Hir or Marwan and Abdul Basit Usman.

Article continues after this advertisement

The beleaguered police official’s lawyer also pointed out that carrying out the arrest warrants against the terrorist suspects does not need the approval of Aquino.

“Oplan Exodus was based on the PNP’s mandate under RA 6975 and on the strength of a warrant of arrest, the enforcement of which does not require approval of the President,” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Following their logic, then even the judge who issued the arrest warrant could be made liable,” Purisima added.

RELATED VIDEO

RELATED STORIES

 

Purisima admits he’s accountable for ill-fated ‘Oplan Exodus’

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

‘US behind Oplan Exodus’

Aquino briefed on ‘Oplan Exodus’ to get Marwan – Napeñas

TAGS: Marwan, PNP‎, Purisima

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.