Smartmatic protests disqualification from Comelec bidding | Inquirer News

Smartmatic protests disqualification from Comelec bidding

By: - Reporter / @santostinaINQ
/ 06:10 PM March 15, 2015

MANILA, Philippines – Election technology provider Smartmatic-Total Information Management Corporation has filed a protest at the Commission on Elections (Comelec) en banc to seek the reversal of its disqualification in the bidding for the lease of new voting machines that will be used for the 2016 elections.

The protest came after the Comelec-Bids and Awards Committee (BAC) denied the motion for reconsideration earlier filed by Smartmatic-TIM on its disqualification in the second stage of the public bidding for both the DRE and OMR projects.

In its protest, Smartmatic-TIM asked the Comelec en banc to overrule the poll body’s Bids and Awards Committee’s (BAC) decision and declare the company as a qualified bidder for the lease of the Optical Mark Reader (OMR) and Direct Recording Electronic (DRE).

Article continues after this advertisement

“Smartmatic-TIM respectfully prays that this Honorable Committee reverse respondent BAC’s resolution and declare the Smartmatic joint venture as qualified to participate in the second stage of the two-stage competitive bidding for the lease of the (OMR and DRE),” said Smartmatic-TIM.

FEATURED STORIES

Last February 25, the Comelec-BAC disqualified the multinational company after it submitted a non-responsive bid that featured several items left with “blank” price offers in their financial proposals.

In its protests, Smartmatic-TIM used the dissenting opinions of BAC members lawyer Divina Blas-Perez and Charlie Yap in their disqualification.

Article continues after this advertisement

According to Smartmatic-TIM, Yap’s position should be reconsidered after he said that placing “-“ for an item should mean that it is already being offered for free to the government.

Article continues after this advertisement

The company said the opinion of Yap was consistent with the issuances of the Government Procurement Policy Board (GPPB).

Article continues after this advertisement

“The BAC disqualifies a consultant if it provides for a required item but does not indicate a price for it and is thus deemed as non-compliant, except that if it specifies a ‘0’ (zero) or a ‘-‘ (dash) for the said item, it would be deemed as having offered the item for free to the government,” Smartmatic-TIM quoted the GPPB as saying.

It also noted that Blas-Perez saw the “totality” of the bid of Smartmatic-TIM as the detailed costing of the items supposedly left “blank” show that “zeros” have been placed.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Based on the financial proposal breakdown of each component, the respondent BAC can easily confirm the Smartmatic joint venture’s pricing, which is consistent with the Overall Summary,” stressed Smartmatic-TIM.

Last week, the Comelec–BAC issued separate invitations to bid (ITBs) for the second round of bidding for the lease of 410 DRE units and 23,000 OMR machines.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: bidding, Commission on Elections, DRE, News, OMR

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.