Sandiganbayan denies Enrile’s bail in plunder case | Inquirer News

Sandiganbayan denies Enrile’s bail in plunder case

/ 04:37 PM July 17, 2014

Sen. Juan Ponce-Enrile. INQUIRER.net FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines—The Sandiganbayan Third Division on Thursday denied the motion of Senator Juan Ponce Enrile for the court to fix his bail in the plunder case.

In a minute resolution, the court effectively snubbed Enrile’s argument that he be allowed to post bail due to his age and frail health.

Article continues after this advertisement

The court said it could not fix bail for Enrile because the accused has yet to file a motion asking the court to allow him to post bail.

FEATURED STORIES

Such a motion would result in a bail hearing, where the prosecution would show that the evidence of guilt is strong.

If guilt is not strong, the accused may be allowed to post bail, according to court rules.

Article continues after this advertisement

Without such a bail motion for a hearing, it would be premature for the court to fix Enrile’s bail, or in other words, to set the amount of his bail, the resolution read.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Clearly, it is only after the prosecution shall have presented its evidence, and the court shall have made a determination that the evidence of guilt is not strong against Enrile, can he demand bail as a matter of right. Then and only then will the court be duty-bound to fix the amount of his bail,” the resolution read.

Article continues after this advertisement

“To be sure, no such determination has been made by the court. In fact, accused Enrile has not filed an application for bail. Necessarily, no bail hearing can even commence. It is thus exceedingly premature for Enrile to ask the court to fix his bail,” the resolution added.

Enrile had filed a motion to post bail, but the court junked it as premature because the senator filed it before probable cause was found against him.

Article continues after this advertisement

In his previous bail motion, Enrile cited his old age and frail health. He again cited these in his motion for the court to fix his bail.

The court acknowledged that Enrile’s “age (and) his physical condition … are among the factors that are considered in fixing a reasonable amount of bail.”

“However… it is premature for the court to fix the amount of bail without an anterior showing that the evidence of guilt against him is not strong,” the resolution read.

Enrile surrendered to the police after his warrant of arrest was issued for his plunder case over the pork barrel scam. But shortly after, he was rushed to the hospital due to his frail health.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

RELATED STORIES

Enrile may go to any hospital at his expense, says Sandigan

Let Enrile go home, lawyer urges court

TAGS: Nation, News, Plunder

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.