Bills seeking to punish monopoly, unfair trade practices re-filed in Congress | Inquirer News

Bills seeking to punish monopoly, unfair trade practices re-filed in Congress

Caption: Rep. Feliciano Belmonte, who is expected to retain his post as Speaker in the new Congress, said his House Bill No. 1333 “aims to level the playing field by strengthening the legal and institutional framework that would combat unfair trade practices.”

MANILA, Philippines — Bills seeking to punish companies engaged in unfair trade practices have been resurrected in the 16th Congress.

Representatives Feliciano Belmonte of Quezon City and Rufus Rodriguez of Cagayan de Oro have filed their respective versions of the anti-trust bill, which would put up the Philippine Fair Competition Commission (PFCC).

Article continues after this advertisement

To be placed under the Office of the President, the PFCC would go after “anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominant position, and anti-competitive mergers.”

FEATURED STORIES

Belmonte, who is expected to retain his post as Speaker in the new Congress, said his House Bill No. 1333 “aims to level the playing field by strengthening the legal and institutional framework that would combat unfair trade practices.”

In HB No. 388, Rodriguez argued that “the lack of genuine competition in certain industries impairs public welfare and undermines the country’s credibility to provide a business climate conducive to investment.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“With this bill, it is believed that unfair competitions, monopolies and cartels shall be properly regulated, if not totally eradicated, which will ultimately protect the consumers from abuses if market powers,” he said in the explanatory note.

Article continues after this advertisement

An anti-trust bill was approved by the Committee on Trade and Industry and went as far as the second reading in the 15th Congress, he recalled.

Article continues after this advertisement

Belmonte’s proposal seeks to prohibit “the abuse of market-dominant positions and the excessive concentration of economic power.”

He sought to do this “by regulating improper concerted acts and unfair business practices, thereby stimulating creative business activities, protecting consumers and promoting balanced development of the national economy.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Among the prohibited acts are “anti-competitive agreements,” which “prevent, distort or restrict competition.” They include price-fixing and bid-rigging.

“Abuse of dominant position” refers to “predatory behavior toward competitors, limitation and control of markets, market allocation, and arrangements to share markets or sources of supply.”

It covers boycotts, meaning “any concerted refusal to sell or conspiracy not to sell or to stop doing business on the part of the suppliers of any goods, unless for a legitimate purpose.”

The Belmonte and Rodriguez measures also seek to penalize “anti-competitive mergers” or those that could “substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly.”

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Fine is set between P10 million and P50 million for individuals, and P250 million and P750 million for firms.

TAGS: Business, Congress, House of Representatives, Legislation, Monopoly

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.