Senate, House OK new version of Anti-Money Laundering Act | Inquirer News

Senate, House OK new version of Anti-Money Laundering Act

/ 07:03 PM February 06, 2013

MANILA, Philippines – The Senate has ratified the bicameral conference committee report on the chamber and the House of Representatives’ reconciled bills that aim to strengthen the Anti-Money Laundering Act (Amla) Wednesday.

Congress is under pressure to pass amendments on the Amla or else face being black listed by the international Financial Action Task Force (FATF), before Congress goes into recess to give way to the May 2013 election campaign.

Senator Teofisto Guingona III however said that what they passed was not an assurance the Philippines will not be blacklisted.

Article continues after this advertisement

“On February 18 we will know whether what we have passed is enough for us to get out of the dark grey list [either] upwards or go down to the blacklist,” he told reporters.

FEATURED STORIES

“FATF might just say: ‘sorry but what you passed, though you did pass something, is not enough,'” Guingona said.

The new version will require money changers, jewelry and precious metals dealers, real estate and pre-need firms to submit data on suspicious transactions to the Anti-Money Laundering Council but has waived off such a requirement for casinos.

Article continues after this advertisement

The measure will make its way into the hands of President Benigno Aquino III, to be signed into law, after both chambers of the 15th Congress have ratified it.

Article continues after this advertisement

On the removal of a provision requiring casinos to report to the AMLC when a suspected money launderer was in the premises, Senator Teofisto Guingona III said that they no longer argued against it because they were running out of time and must pass the law to avoid being blacklisted.

Article continues after this advertisement

“It’s better to have a law than no law at all. Otherwise, we would end up in the blacklist,” Guingona had previously said. “It was a choice between being blacklisted for sure and the possibility of being blacklisted.”

He however said that the deletion of the provision on casinos was a big loss. “Ang laki ng butas na naiwan,” Guingona said.

Article continues after this advertisement

He said that the Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporation (Pagcor) did not want the provision on casinos. It was also seen as a deterrent to investors, Guingona said.

If ever the country would be placed in the blacklist, it would make it harder for overseas Filipino workers (OFWs) to send remittances into the country.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“Any money going to the Philippines or coming out of the Philippines, will have to be proven that it’s not dirty money [and] to prove it’s not dirty money [a lot of] requirements [would need to be complied with],” Guingona said.

TAGS: Crime, Nation, News

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.