Paying for Balili land again | Inquirer News
Editorial

Paying for Balili land again

/ 06:49 AM November 23, 2012

Whether or not it was political mileage that brought two Capitol officials to the Balili estate last Wednesday, Cebuanos deserve to know what is happening in the province-owned property in barangay Tinaan, Naga City that was bought with almost P100 million in taxpayers money.

The variety of answers given since 2008 have run the gamut from bangus farming to coal ash waste pollution to international port dreaming.

After two checks were signed with amazing ease in favor of the private land owners, the transaction – including a $1 million deal on the side with Korean power plant investors to use the property for a waste disposal facility – looked more like land speculation maximized on both ends.

Article continues after this advertisement

The public never got a consistent answer for why so much money was being poured into property that was more than 80 percent under water.

FEATURED STORIES

Last August, what was clear was that the Ombudsman smelled graft.

Criminal charges were filed against the governor and seven others, a case that has yet to see its first day of trial in the Sandiganbayan.

Article continues after this advertisement

The 24.7 hectare coastal property – what happened to the purchase, who benefited from it, and what will happen now to the vast estate deserves public scrutiny.

Article continues after this advertisement

If the land itself is Exhibit No. 1 in a graft case, why are more public funds being spent to cover the surface with limestone and soil?

Article continues after this advertisement

Allegations of a coverup won’t influence the Sandiganbayan justices since the facts of purchase and the original state of the foreshore land have already been established as hard evidence.

You can pour concrete over the whole estate, and that wouldn’t change the history of the transaction.

Article continues after this advertisement

But why spend more funds on land whose future remains unclear?

There may even be more irregularities involved if it’s true that a P27 million contract to excavate and reclaim land there has no approval from the Provincial Board.

Land moving work doesn’t happen for free. Who’s paying the bill? That’s a question that deserves a clear answer.

If Vice Gov. Agnes Magpale, and Provincial Board Member Arleigh Sitoy are accused of “trespassing” for visiting the government-owned land without a permit from Gov. Gwendolyn Garcia, how much of a chance do ordinary citizens have of entering to find out what’s going on as well?

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

You’d have to get past shotgun-ready security guards in the Balili estate. It would be more violence-free to just answer questions of public interest.

TAGS: Naga City, Tax

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.