It’s final: Dinagat Islands a province, SC rules | Inquirer News

It’s final: Dinagat Islands a province, SC rules

By: - Reporter / @JeromeAningINQ
/ 05:18 AM September 21, 2012

[wpgmappity id=”706″]

The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled with finality that the law creating Dinagat Islands province out of Surigao del Norte in 2006 was constitutional.

The high tribunal denied the motion for reconsideration filed by Surigao political leaders Rodolfo Navarro, Victor Bernal and Rene Medina, which asked the Supreme Court to reinstate its Feb. 10, 2010, ruling which said that Republic Act No. 9355 creating Dinagat Islands, the country’s 80th province, was unconstitutional.

Article continues after this advertisement

On April 12, 2011, the high court reversed itself and declared RA 9355 valid.

FEATURED STORIES

The reversal was described by critics as “flip flopping” and accused the court of favoring the island’s Gov. Glenda Ecleo and her son, Rep. Ruben Ecleo Jr., who were members of the then ruling administration party Lakas-Kampi-CMD headed by ex-President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo.

The younger Ecleo remains in hiding from a warrant of arrest issued for the murder of his wife years ago. He heads the Philippine Benevolent Missionaries Association cult that was founded by his late father and most of whose members are from the Dinagat Islands.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The court resolved to deny with finality the said motion for reconsideration as no substantial arguments were presented to warrant the reversal of the questioned resolution,” read the Sept. 11 resolution signed by clerk of court Enriqueta Vidal.

Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio wrote a dissenting opinion that was joined in by Chief Justice Ma. Lourdes Sereno and Justices Arturo Brion, Diosdado Peralta, Martin Villarama Jr. and Estela Perlas-Bernabe.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Government, Judiciary, Politics, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.