RH debate far from over—Enrile | Inquirer News

RH debate far from over—Enrile

/ 04:19 AM July 30, 2012

Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile. SENATE POOL

Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile on Monday told proponents of the reproductive health (RH) bill the debate on the contentious measure was not over as a lot of questions still needed to be answered.

“I don’t know why some insist the time is ripe to approve the RH bill. This is not a banana or mango or durian. It involves a lot of things,” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Enrile said he was for reopening the period of interpellation for the controversial bill, which had ended even before the senators turned their attention to the impeachment trial of Chief Justice Renato Corona earlier this year.

FEATURED STORIES

The Senate President expressed anxiety over how the RH bill was being marketed as “prohealth” and “prowomen,” arguing that birth control has caused “social problems” in First World countries.

Enrile said he would not interpret the President’s call for responsible parenthood during his State of the Nation Address as a direct expression of support for the RH bill.

Article continues after this advertisement

Responsible parenthood, he said, does not involve the government in the purchase and distribution of contraceptives and other forms of artificial birth control as provided for in the RH bill.

Enrile noted that no one had contradicted the President’s support for responsible parenthood. Cathy Yamsuan

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Government, Legislation, RH bill, Senate

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.