2 Associate Justices, 3 more Aquino execs decline | Inquirer News

2 Associate Justices, 3 more Aquino execs decline

By: - Reporter / @T2TupasINQ
/ 06:09 PM July 02, 2012

The Supreme Court building in Manila. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines—Two Associate Justices of the Supreme Court three more officials from the Executive Department have declined their nomination for the Chief Justice post.

Supreme Court Associate Justices Lucas Bersamin and Jose Perez have decided to back out opting to follow the seniority tradition at the high court.

Article continues after this advertisement

On the other hand, Labor Secretary Rosalinda Dimapilis Baldoz, Government’s Chief Negotiator for the MILF and former UP Law Dean Marvic Leonen and Public Attorneys Office Chief Persida Rueda Acosta also turned down their nomination.

FEATURED STORIES

Baldoz, who was caught unaware of the nomination, said she is not interested for the position.

“We have started instituting reforms at DOLE and we are still looking for other areas for improvements for the sake of our workers and employers investing here,” Baldoz told reporters.

Article continues after this advertisement

Acosta, on the other hand said she “begs off from this distinct privilege in view of her ardent commitment to the Public Attorney’s Office (PAO) and its mandated clients nationwide.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Others who have expressed no interest and declined their nominations are the following:
1. Court Administrator Jose Midas Marquez

Article continues after this advertisement

2. Constitutionalist Fr. Joaquin Bernas

3. Senator Miriam Defensor-Santiago

Article continues after this advertisement

4. Senator Franklin Drilon

5. Supreme Court Associate Justice Mariano Del Castillo

6. SC Justice Bienvenido Reyes

7. SC Justice Estela Perlas Bernabe

8. Sandiganbayan Presiding Justice Francisco Villaruz

9. Court of Appeals Presiding Justice Andres Reyes

10. Cebu based Court of Appeals Associate Justice Gabriel Ingles

11. Appeals Court Justice Magdangal De Leon

12. Executive Secretary Pacquito Ochoa

13. Former Defense Secretary Gilberto Teodoro Jr.

14. Former Energy Secretary Raphael Lotilla

15. Dean Rodolfo Robles

16. Prosecutor Marianito Sasondoncillo

17. Integrated Bar of the Philippines President Roan Libarios

18. Former Ombudsman Simeon Marcelo

19. Veteran Journalist Teodoro Locsin Jr.

20. BIR Commissioner Kim Jacinto Henares

21. Former Senator Rene Saguisag.

22. Former Solicitor General Francisco Chavez

There are three other nominees–two Justices and a lower court judge who declined and requested the JBC to exclude their names from the list.

There are already 71 nominees for the top high court post and two applicants. Two have been disqualified—one for being a non-lawyer and the other for being overage.

The Judicial and Bar Council (JBC) which vets nominees for the judiciary and the Office of the Ombudsman will release the final list of candidates by Friday.

Atty. Milagros Cayosa, JBC member who represents the Integrated Bar of the Philippines, said that beginning Tuesday  they will start screening the applicants based on the requirements stated under the 1987 Constitution.

Under Article 8 Section 7 of the 1987 Constitution, a member of the Supreme Court must be a natural-born citizen of the Philippines, at least 40 years of age, and must have been for 15 years or more, a judge of a lower court or engaged in the practice of law in the Philippines.

The same law also requires that a member of the Judiciary must be “a person of proven competence, integrity, probity, and independence.”

She said the JBC will publish the names of the candidates who will make it on the initial screening.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The JBC targets to submit a shortlist of nominees to the President by end of July.

TAGS: JBC, Nation, News, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.