Lawyers’ group reminds Senate of limitations during investigations

Lawyers’ group reminds Senate of limitations during investigations

By: - Reporter / @jownmanaloINQ
/ 10:48 PM October 20, 2024

Senate hearing

Inquirer photo/Niño Jesus Orbeta

MANILA, Philippines — A lawyers’ group on Sunday has reminded the Senate of its limitations during investigations, in relation to the recent probe into Philippine Offshore Gaming Operators (Pogos) and the upcoming inquiry into former president Rodrigo Duterte’s drug war.

In a statement, Quezon City Trial Lawyers League president Atty. Victor Rodriguez stated three limitations on the power of legislative investigation:

Article continues after this advertisement
  1. The inquiry must be in aid of legislation.
  2. The inquiry must be conducted in accordance with its duly published Rules of Procedure.
  3. The rights of persons appearing in or affected by such inquiries shall be respected.

READ: Duterte to be summoned to Senate-led drug war probe, says Bato

FEATURED STORIES

According to Rodriguez, members of the Senate must comply with these limitations to prevent the occurrence of possible rights violations during investigations.

Among the rights usually affected during inquiries are the right against self-incrimination and the right to privacy, Rodriguez noted in the statement.

Article continues after this advertisement

He added that the right to self-incrimination may be availed only when asked, while the right to privacy is not absolute.

Article continues after this advertisement

In addition, the Quezon City Trial Lawyers League referenced two Supreme Court cases to clarify the duration for which a resource person can be held in contempt during a legislative investigation.

Article continues after this advertisement

“In Ong v. Senate, G.R. Nos. 257401 & 257916, 28 March 2023, the Supreme Court stated: ‘Also, where there is factual basis for the contempt, the resource person‘s detention should only last until the termination of the legislative inquiry.’

“Moreover, in Balag v. Senate, G.R. No. 234608, 03 July 2018, the Supreme Court held: ‘The Court further ruled that the inquiry would terminate in two instances: (1) Upon approval or disapproval of the Committee Report, which is within 15 days after conclusion of the inquiry; and (2) Upon expiration of the Congress.’”

Article continues after this advertisement

For any investigation conducted by the Senate, it must also follow its established rules, according to the lawyers’ group.

These include the Senate’s official Rules, Resolution No. 5, which outlines the procedures for investigations conducted in aid of legislation, and Senate P.S. Resolution No. 889, which was introduced by Senator Francis Tolentino.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: lawyers, Senate inquiry

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.