Binay on Quiboloy's snub of Senate: 'He needs to appear virtually or physically' | Inquirer News

Binay on Quiboloy’s snub of Senate: ‘He needs to appear virtually or physically’

By: - Reporter / @MAgerINQ
/ 05:04 PM March 12, 2024

BINAY ASKS UPDATE OF DOTr PROJECTS: Sen. Nancy Binay expresses her concern over a project of the Department of Transportation (DOTr), the Manila Area Control Center (MACC), which she said has not been utilized for the last 10 years. DOTr Undersecretary Roberto Cecilio Lim told Binay the MACC, which was acquired around 2005 or 2006, did not become fully operational because it was superseded by a newer equipment. In addition, he said the MACC had issues on accuracy and reliability. Lim said DOTr is exploring a mutual termination of the contract with the vendor because the MACC is already obsolete and not relevant. Binay also asked about the status of the Land Transportation Management System. Land Transportation Office (LTO) chief Vigor Mendoza said the agency has accomplished almost 100 percent of the drivers’ license under the new system and 90 plus percent of the renewal of motorcycle registration. “We are closely working with the Department of Information and Communications Technology to help us operate this system,” Mendoza told Binay during the proposed 2024 budget hearing of the DOTr and its attached agencies Tuesday, September 12, 2023. (Senate PRIB photos)

Senator Nancy Binay (File photo from Senate PRIB)

MANILA, Philippines — Senator Nancy Binay sided with a Senate panel’s decision to require Pastor Apollo Quiboloy’s attendance in its ongoing probe against him.

Binay is vice chairperson of the Senate committee on women, which is investigating the alleged human rights abuses, including rape, being hurled at Quiboloy and his Kingdom of Jesus Christ sect.

Article continues after this advertisement

Panel head Senator Risa Hontiveros has requested Senate President Juan Miguel  Zubiri to order the arrest of Quiboloy following the latter’s refusal to attend the probe.

FEATURED STORIES

Binay said she respects the decision of Hontiveros. She cited a tradition in the Senate where committee members “yield to the wisdom of the chairperson.”

“Kasi, di ba, parang hindi rin naman kasi katanggap-tanggap na hindi natin nire-require na mag-attend yung isang resource (person), ang isang imbitado sa Senado, di ba?” she told reporters on Tuesday when asked if she signed a written objection to the contempt order and possible arrest of Quiboloy.

Article continues after this advertisement

(Because isn’t it also unacceptable that we don’t require a resource person, an invitee to the Senate, to attend?)

Article continues after this advertisement

“More than that, parang mawawalan yung power ng Senado na mag-invite ng resource persons,” the senator explained.

Article continues after this advertisement

(More than that, it seems like the Senate will lose its power to invite resource persons.)

But Senator Robin Padilla, during last week’s hearing, objected to Hontiveros’ request  to arrest Quiboloy.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Senate rules allow the majority members of the committee to reverse or modify  the contempt order within 7 days.

In this case, Padilla has until this Tuesday to get eight signatures to reverse Hontiveros’ order.

Only four senators have, so far, signed the written objection — Padilla, Senators Christopher “Bong” Go, Cynthia Villar and Imee Marcos.

Binay, meanwhile, said she is also open to the idea of allowing Quiboloy to virtually attend the investigation.

“Basta ang sa akin lang, kailangan mag-appear sya dun sa committee, whether virtual or physically present,” she stressed.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

(He needs to appear before the committee, whether virtually or physically present.)

TAGS: Nancy Binay, Probe, Quiboloy

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.