Donald Trump defiant after backlash over NATO remarks

Donald Trump defiant after backlash over NATO remarks

/ 07:33 AM February 13, 2024

donald trump case

Republican presidential candidate and former U.S. President Donald Trump holds a campaign rally ahead of the Republican caucus in Las Vegas, Nevada, U.S., January 27, 2024. REUTERS/Ronda Churchill/File Photo

Washington, United States — Former US president Donald Trump defended his record on NATO Monday, saying he had made it “strong” after sparking a firestorm of criticism over comments downplaying his commitment to the alliance.

Trump was rebuked from all sides after saying in a speech Saturday that he would “encourage” Russia to attack members of NATO who had not met their financial obligations, in his most extreme broadside against the organization.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: Nato leader: Trump put allies at risk over Russia remark

FEATURED STORIES

“I MADE NATO STRONG, and even the RINOS and Radical Left Democrats admit that,” Trump said on Truth Social Monday, using an acronym deployed by conservatives for critics within their own party: Republicans in Name Only.

“When I told the 20 Countries that weren’t paying their fair share that they had to PAY UP, and said without doing that you will not have US Military Protection, the money came rolling in. After so many years of the United States picking up the tab, it was a beautiful sight to see.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Trump has long complained about NATO, accusing Western allies of being freeloaders who do not pull their weight on military spending, taking for granted that they can rely on the US as a defensive shield.

Article continues after this advertisement

But he repeatedly demonstrated during and after his time in office that he either doesn’t understand how NATO works or is unwilling to speak accurately about it.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: Biden slams Trump’s ‘appalling and dangerous’ NATO comments

In 2006, NATO countries made a vague commitment — formalized in 2014 — to spend two percent of their gross domestic product on their own defense, but members do not pay subscription fees and do not “owe” the alliance money for defense.

Article continues after this advertisement

The two percent benchmark is voluntary, and there are no penalties enshrined in NATO’s founding treaty for falling short.

Speaking at a campaign rally in South Carolina on Saturday, Trump had described what he said was a conversation with a fellow head of state at an unspecified NATO meeting.

“One of the presidents of a big country stood up and said, ‘Well, sir, if we don’t pay, and we’re attacked by Russia, will you protect us?’ I said, ‘You didn’t pay, you’re delinquent? No, I would not protect you,'” Trump told his supporters.

“In fact, I would encourage them to do whatever the hell they want.”

President Joe Biden slammed the comments as “appalling and dangerous,” warning that his predecessor, who is running for reelection, intended to give Russian leader Vladimir Putin “a greenlight for more war and violence.”

Trump’s remarks came after Senate Republicans last week rejected a bipartisan bill that would have included $60 billion in funding for Ukraine, plus aid for ally Israel, along with reforms to address the US-Mexico border crisis.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

A foreign aid package that includes the Kyiv support but decouples the funding from the border issue entirely passed a key procedural vote in the US Senate on Sunday. However, Republicans are still expected to block it from becoming law.

TAGS: Donald Trump, NATO

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.