'Unacceptable' to bar, limit access of police aviation security, Dela Rosa tells airport execs | Inquirer News

‘Unacceptable’ to bar, limit access of police aviation security, Dela Rosa tells airport execs

By: - Reporter / @MAgerINQ
/ 07:14 PM March 20, 2023

Airport officials got a mouthful from Senator Ronald “Bato” Dela Rosa on Monday  for supposedly barring the police aviation security group from entering the Ninoy Aquino International Airport (Naia).

Senator Ronald “Bato” dela Rosa speaks during the Kapihan sa Manila Bay forum in this file photo taken on March 1, 2023. INQUIRER.net / Ryan Leagogo

MANILA, Philippines — Airport officials got a mouthful from Senator Ronald “Bato” Dela Rosa on Monday for supposedly barring the police aviation security group from entering the Ninoy Aquino International Airport (Naia).

According to Dela Rosa, he was told by members of the Philippine National Police-Aviation Security Group (PNP-AVSEG) that they are no longer allowed inside the Naia.

Article continues after this advertisement

He said it would be “a very immature reaction” and could compromise airport security if the supposed policy change resulted from the Senate probe on alleged human smuggling at the Naia.

FEATURED STORIES

But Manila International Airport Authority (MIAA) General Manager Cesar Chiong immediately denied this during the Senate blue ribbon committee hearing.

“No sir, that’s not true, sir. In fact, during our coordination meeting with the PNP-AVSEG, it was clarified that the access passes that were given to them, they are authorized to enter the NAIA premises, sir,” Chiong said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“So mali pala yung nagsabi sa akin na AVSEG  na hindi sila makapasok [So it was wrong when someone said AVSEG can no longer enter]?” Dela Rosa asked.

Article continues after this advertisement

The senator nevertheless reminded  Chiong that under the law,  it is clearly stated that the police’s aviation security group is mandated to secure all the country’s airports against offensive and terrorist acts.

Article continues after this advertisement

The law also clearly provides that the PNP-AVSEG should exercise operational control and supervision over all agencies involved in airport security operations.

“Ito ba’y na amend na batas? Ito bay na supersede na ng another batas or ito ba’y na repeal na na batas? I’m sure hindi pa…San ka nakakita ng aviation  security group na binabawalang pumasok sa loob ng airport?”  asked the former  top cop.

Article continues after this advertisement

(Was the law amended? Was it superseded by another law or was the law already repealed? I’m sure it’s not.  Where  do you see an aviation  security group being prevented entry from the airport?)

“Alam nyo kung magkakaroon ng hijacking dyan,  magkakaroon ng terrorist attack, sino ang sisihin? Sila dahil by law, according to this law, sila ang in-charge sa security dyan. Sila ang sisihin.  Ngayon binabawalan ninyo, that’s  unacceptable.  You’re violating the law kung ganyan ang ginagawa ninyo. Hindi po pwede yung ginagawa nyong ganun, that’s violation of law,” the senator added.

(You know, if there’s a hijacking or terrorist attack, who will be liable? It’s because by law, according to this law, they are in-charge in the security there.  They will be liable. Now you’re preventing them. That’s unacceptable. You’re violating the law if you’re doing that. That’s not allowed. That’s a violation of the law.)

Panel chairman, Senato Francis  Tolentino,  backed Dela Rosa, saying he knew there was a change of procedure now at the airport.

“Yung aviation police, pagkalamapas  dun  sa X-ray machine, clearances carousel  hanggang dun na lang sila. Hindi  na sila maka advance kasi yun daw ang bagong patakaran mo,” he said directing  his statement to Chiong.

(The aviation police are only allowed at the X-ray machine, the clearance carousel area. They can’t advance  because that’s  your new  rule.)

Only the airport police wearing vests, he said, are now allowed near the pre-departure  area.

“Bakit ho kinakailangan ng ganito. Ito  siguro yung sinasabi ni Senator Dela Rosa e,”  Tolentino said.

(Why do you have to do this? This is what Senator  Dela Rosa  is saying.)

Chiong again clarified that they did not change the policies and the  IDs of the PNP-AVSEG,  noting that their access passes were the same as given during the last administration.

“So yung tinatawag na authorized area, yung red, so wala ho kaming binago sir . Kung ano ho yung   binigay dati yun  pa rin ho ang binigay sa kanila,” the MIAA chief pointed out.

(Red is an authorized area, we did not change anything, but it is still the same.)

Dela Rosa insisted on the information he relayed and urged authorities to correct the policy contravening the law.

“We will do that sir, we will coordinate po with the PNP-AVSEG,” Chiong said.

Dela Rosa  also warned  the MIAA against its so-called “airport police.”

“That’s unconstitutional. Sabihan ko kayo that’s  unconstitutional. We can question that anytime,”  said the senator.  “In fact,  hindi nga covered pa ng batas yan, executive order yung basis  nyo dyan, gumagawa kayo ng airport police.”

(That’s unconstitutional. I’m telling you that’s unconstitutional. We can question that anytime. The law did not cover it. Your basis was an executive order when you created that airport police)

Dela Rosa stressed that there is only one police force, the PNP.  The use of the word “police” then,  is only reserved for the  PNP, he also said.

RELATED STORY:

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Senate set to probe security gaps at Naia

JPV/abc
TAGS: airport, NAIA, PNP‎, Security

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.