100 fisherfolk stage fluvial protest against Manila Bay dredging | Inquirer News

100 fisherfolk stage fluvial protest against Manila Bay dredging

/ 06:01 PM March 14, 2023

At least 11 fisherfolk stage a fluvial protest against dredging activities in Manila Bay on Tuesday, March 14, 2023

At least 11 fisherfolk stage a fluvial protest against dredging activities in Manila Bay on Tuesday, March 14, 2023. Photo from Pamalakaya

MANILA, Philippines — At least 100 fisherfolk under the group Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya) held a fluvial protest in Cavite to demand an end to dredging activities in the southern portion of Manila Bay.

According to a statement from Pamalakaya, 50 fishing boats sailed along the municipal waters of Rosario, Tanza, and Noveleta in Cavite.

Article continues after this advertisement

The fishing organization said the fisherfolk came from several coastal towns affected by the dredging, protesting the operations that have negatively impacted their way of life.

FEATURED STORIES

“Napakalaking perwisyo na ang idinulot ng dredging sa mga mangingisda sa Cavite. Hindi na dapat hayaang madagdagan pa ang lawak ng pinsala nito sa kalikasan at sa kabuhayan ng mga maliliit na mga mangingisda sa lalawigan,” Pamalakaya National Chairperson Fernando Hicap said in a statement.

At least 11 fisherfolk stage a fluvial protest against dredging activities in Manila Bay on Tuesday, March 14, 2023.

At least 11 fisherfolk stage a fluvial protest against dredging activities in Manila Bay on Tuesday, March 14, 2023. Photo from Pamalakaya.

(The dredging activities have already caused significant harm to fishers. It must not be allowed to damage further the marine life and the livelihoods of small-scale fisherfolk in the province.)

Article continues after this advertisement

According to Pamalakaya, the dredging activities inflicted substantial and irreparable harm on the marine ecosystem in Manila Bay, leading to a decline in fish stocks.

Article continues after this advertisement

Moreover, the fisherfolks restated throughout the demonstration its demand for the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) to revoke the environmental permits it had previously given to San Miguel Corporation and the Dutch firm Royal Boskalis Westminster N.V. for their destructive dredging activities in Manila Bay.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Sa isa sa mga pag-aaral nito, mismong ang DENR na ang nagsabi na masagana pa sa bahura ang katimugang bahagi ng Manila Bay, partikular sa lalawigan ng Cavite. Kung kaya’t nakapagtataka na inaprubahan at patuloy na pinahihintulutan ang mga mapanirang proyektong ito,” Fernando Hicap, Pamalakaya national chairperson stated.

(In one of its own studies, the DENR itself said that the southern part of Manila Bay, mainly the province of Cavite, is still rich in coral reefs. So, it baffles us that they greenlit and continue to allow these destructive dredging projects.)

Article continues after this advertisement

Hicap said that the number of dredge vessels in Rosario had been reduced from three to one due to the fisherfolk’s “sustained and consistent push backs” against the dredging operations during the previous few weeks.

The fisherfolks leader noted that the protests won’t end until the dredging operations are entirely halted and the businesses responsible for the damaging operations make reparations for the harm they have done to the coastal ecosystems and the livelihoods of fishermen. – Kimberly D. Albaño, INQUIRER.net intern

RELATED STORIES:

Pamalakaya storms BFAR, slams Manila Bay dredging, reclamation projects

Pamalakaya to DENR: Stop ‘destructive’ Manila Bay reclamation projects

Pamalakaya: Manila Bay rehab a failure

JPV
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: dredging, Pamalakaya, protest

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.