Armed bystander credited with preventing more deaths in Indiana shooting | Inquirer News

Armed bystander credited with preventing more deaths in Indiana shooting

/ 06:32 AM July 19, 2022

GREENWOOD, Ind.  –  The gunman who killed three people in a shopping mall near Indianapolis would likely have taken many move lives if not for the “heroic” actions of an armed bystander who shot the suspect dead and stopped the attack, police said on Monday.

Elisjsha Dicken, 22, who was lawfully carrying a concealed firearm at the time, “engaged” the suspect on Sunday almost as soon he opened fire with a rifle in a food court at the Greenwood Park Mall in Greenwood, Indiana, authorities said. Police said they did not know the motive behind the rampage.

Article continues after this advertisement

Dicken immediately became a cause celebre for gun rights advocates, who argue — despite government statistics to the contrary — that armed civilians are the best defense against the kinds of random mass shootings that killed more than 100 people in the United States last year.

FEATURED STORIES

Greenwood Police Chief Jim Ison credited Dicken, who was at the shopping mall with his girlfriend on Sunday night, as a hero whose bravery and competence prevented further bloodshed. Dicken now needed “space and time to process what he’s gone through,” the chief said in an appeal for restraint by the media.

Although he lacked any law enforcement or military training, Dicken exhibited “proficient” and “tactically sound” moves in firing at “the gunman with a handgun from quite a distance,” Ison told reporters the next day.

Article continues after this advertisement

“As he engaged and closed in on the suspect,” Dicken motioned for others in the vicinity to exit behind him, the chief said, adding that Dicken afterward turned himself over to mall security personnel and cooperated with police.

Article continues after this advertisement

The shooting lasted just two minutes from the time the suspect opened fire until he was killed. Beforehand, the gunman had spent more than an hour in a mall restroom, apparently preparing for the attack and putting together the murder weapon he carried disassembled in a bag, the chief said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Dicken was initially handcuffed, and his gun was confiscated before he was taken for questioning to the police department, where his account was verified by video footage, according to Ison.

“Many more people would’ve died last night if not for a responsible armed citizen that took action very quickly within the first two minutes of the shooting,” Ison said.

Article continues after this advertisement

The gunman was identified as Jonathan Douglas Sapirman, 20, a local resident who had lived alone, quit his warehouse job in May and had recently been evicted, the chief said.

Ison also said the suspect had two rifles and a handgun with several magazines of ammunition and over 100 rounds of bullets and that he fired about 24 rounds from one of the rifles.

Three people were killed and two others were wounded, Ison said. Two of the fatalities were a husband and wife, age 56 and 37, respectively. The third was a 30-year-old man.

STATE LAWS IN FOCUS

A spate of gun violence in public places since May, including mass shootings at a New York state supermarket store, a Texas elementary school and an Illinois Independence Day parade, has renewed a fierce U.S. debate over gun regulations.

Gun rights advocates seized on the latest mass shooting as an example of why it is important to allow Americans to carry firearms.

“We will say it again: The only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun,” the National Rifle Association said in a tweet on Monday morning.

It is rare for a bystander to stop an “active shooter” attack in the United States, according an FBI report in May showing that only two out of 61 such attacks last year ended when “citizens engaged the shooter.” A similar New York Times analysis found that only 22 gunmen in the 433 mass shootings since 2000 were shot by a bystander.

The incident in Indiana also raises questions regarding the interaction between state law and the rights of companies and businesses to ban weapons on their properties.

The shooting comes just weeks after Indiana Governor Eric Holcomb signed a bill into law repealing the state’s handgun permit requirement. Now, anyone 18 years of age or older who is not legally prohibited from firearm possession may generally carry a concealed handgun in public.

The law conflicts with the policy of Simon Property Group, the owner of the Greenwood Park Mall, which prohibits guns on its properties, according to its website. The Indianapolis-based company was unavailable for comment on Monday.

According to Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita, private businesses and property owners may restrict gun owners from carrying a weapon on their property.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Even so, it is generally not against the law to ignore a “no firearms” sign at a private business, he wrote in the state’s Gun Owners’ Bill of Rights before the weekend shooting.

Rokita said the only consequence from ignoring a company’s ban may come only after a direct warning to someone carrying a firearm on the property: “You may commit criminal trespass for entering a business after you have been denied entry or have been asked to leave,” the bill of rights reads.

gsg
TAGS: guns

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.