Environmental issue raised in West Tower case | Inquirer News

Environmental issue raised in West Tower case

By: - Reporter / @santostinaINQ
/ 12:17 AM June 18, 2011

THE LOPEZ-owned First Philippine Industrial Corp., together with its clients Shell and Chevron, on Friday questioned the jurisdiction of the court handling the P2 billion civil case which residents of West Tower condominium had filed against them.

FPIC is the operator of the pipeline system—earlier found to be the source of the oil that had been leaking into the basement of the condominium in Barangay Bangkal, Makati City—that transports Chevron and Shell products from Batangas province to Pandacan.

The respondents and West Tower residents showed up at Makati City’s Regional Trial Court Branch 58 yesterday for the hearing of the respondents’ joint motion for preliminary hearing to urge the court to determine whether the case was environmental in nature or not.

Article continues after this advertisement

The respondents claimed the case is no longer environmental in nature since the complainants are simply asking for compensation and not the enforcement of environmental laws.

FEATURED STORIES

But lawyer Lorna Kapunan, counsel for the building’s residents, said the respondents were merely employing delaying tactics.

She hit the respondents’ firms for allegedly insinuating that the P2 billion in total compensation the residents were seeking was unreasonable and bordering on extortion.

Article continues after this advertisement

“It is appalling how FPIC and the rest of the defendants are now calling the residents of West Tower ‘extortionists’ and ‘opportunists’ in an attempt to weasel their way out of their own mistake,” Kapunan said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“This is not an extortion case. Tell that to the ones who have lost their homes,” she added.

Article continues after this advertisement

Asked to comment about the “extortion” issue, lawyer Jaime Hofilena who represents FPIC, said: “We deny that. This matter should now be addressed by the court.”

Hofilena also reiterated that the case filed by the complainants do not have the elements of being an environmental case under the rules of law. “It’s essentially a case for damages.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The residents claimed they have yet to receive compensation, including expenses they incurred from their own cleanup, relocation and medical bills.

Robert Dimayuga, president of the West Tower Homeowners Association said the P2-billion damage suit included the cost of replacing the residents’ condominium units and other charges.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: fpic, Metro, News

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.