Santiago says she did not receive any money for her vote favouring SC’s TRO | Inquirer News

Santiago says she did not receive any money for her vote favouring SC’s TRO

By: - NewsLab Lead / @MSantosINQ
/ 09:49 PM February 13, 2012

MANILA, Philippines – Senator Miriam Defensor-Santiago said that she has not been offered money in exchange for her vote to abide by the Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) issued by the Supreme Court (SC).

“I have not been contacted in any manner or offered P100 million, either in cash or in any other amount including any other inducement with respect to my vote on today’s caucus,” Santiago said.

The senate voted 13-10 to abide by the TRO of the SC. Santiago was among those who voted to abide by the TRO.

Article continues after this advertisement

The defense panel of SC Chief Justice Renato Corona held a press conference Sunday night to disclose an alleged plan by president Aquino, through executive secretary Paquito Ochoa, to pay P100 million to certain senator-judges in exchange for them to vote against the SC’s TRO on Corona’s dollar accounts.

FEATURED STORIES

“Why [did they] bring the trial outside of the courtroom? You cannot litigate outside [the court room], you cannot try and shape public opinion. That might be derogatory to the judge or to the court,” Santiago said.

Santiago said that if she was a presiding judge, she “would ask the lawyer to show cause why I should not cite him for contempt” because it was “completely forbidden under the rules of court.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“You never hold a press conference about a case that is still pending,” Santiago said.

Article continues after this advertisement

She said that she could not see any urgency in the matter. “They could manifest it in open court if they feel very strongly that they have to reveal it for some reason or other,” Santiago said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Santiago said it was a problem that two trials are being conducted, one “being conducted inside the court room and [another] one is being conducted on the platform of mass media. We all know that this should not be done,” she said.

She said that the impeachment court cannot issue a gag order on both defense and prosecution panels because it might infringe press freedom.

Article continues after this advertisement

“We have to trust only the good faith of the media,” she said.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Senate, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.