Hontiveros raises China bogey if foreigners allowed to fully own public utilities | Inquirer News

Hontiveros raises China bogey if foreigners allowed to fully own public utilities

/ 12:21 PM May 25, 2021

Risa Hontiveros

Sen. Risa Hontiveros (Screen grab/Senate PRIB)

MANILA, Philippines — Proposed amendments to the Public Service Act (PSA), which would allow 100-percent foreign ownership of public utilities, could lead to a rise in Chinese incursions in the Philippines as it would “make way for China to own crucial infrastructure” in the country, Senator Risa Hontiveros warned Tuesday.

In a statement, Hontiveros said that China may use this as “leverage against the Philippines” when it comes to maritime disputes in the West Philippine Sea.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Hindi na nga tumitigil ang Tsina sa pag-aarangkada sa West Philippine Sea, tapos bibigyan pa natin siya ng daan para bilhin ang mga imprastaktura sa loob mismo ng ating bansa?” Hontiveros said.

FEATURED STORIES

(China has not stopped its incursions in the West Philippine Sea, yet we are going to give them a chance to buy infrastructures inside our country?)

“Kinukuha na ang ating mga likas-yaman sa ating karagatan, huwag naman nating hayaang pati sariling industriya natin sa lupa China narin ang naghahari-harian. Ano na ang matitira sa Pilipinas?” she added.

Article continues after this advertisement

(China has already gotten a hold of our natural resources from our waters, I hope we would not let them take over the industries we have on land. What will be left for the Philippines?)

Article continues after this advertisement

Hontiveros said proposed amendments to the PSA would allow foreigners to fully own companies in the telecommunications and transportation sectors, among others.

Article continues after this advertisement

“If we open up our transport sector, for example, does this mean that the so-called Chinese maritime militia can apply for licenses or permits to operate in our domestic waters? We are all for economic development, but never at the expense of our national dignity and sovereignty,” she said.

The senator, who voted against the approval of China-owned Dito Telecommunity’s franchise renewal, stressed that improving services in our country should not come at the expense of national security.

Article continues after this advertisement

“We have vital national security interests that should never be compromised. Sa panahon pang tinataboy ang ating mga mangingisda sa ating mga teritoryo, paano tayo makakasiguro na hindi rin itataboy ng Tsina ang mga Pilipinong manggagawa sa mga industriyang gusto niyang pasukan?” she said.

(We have vital national security interests that should never be compromised. At the time that our Filipino fishermen are being shooed away, how can we ensure that China will not drive away Filipino workers from the industries they want to enter in?)

“We should heighten restrictions on foreign ownership as China’s encroachment in the WPS escalates; not make it easier for her (China) to establish a stronghold in our own land,” she added.

Further, Hontiveros said national security concerns on existing public utilities have yet to be resolved.

These include China’s 40-percent stake in the National Grid Corporation of the Philippines (NGCP) as well as in Dito Telecommunity, the country’s third telco player.

Officials from the NGCP and Dito have repeatedly allayed fears of foreign intrusion.

In 2019, Hontiveros filed separate Senate resolutions seeking an an investigation and a national security audit of the operations and facilities of the NGCP as well as a probe into the Armed Forces of the Philippines’ deal with Dito, which allows the telco to build facilities in military camps and stations.

Concerned Senate committees have already conducted their respective inquiries into the concerns raised by Hontiveros.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

In the Senate, the bill seeking to amend the PSA is currently being deliberated in plenary. The House of Representatives, meanwhile, approved its own version of the measure in March last year.

EDV
TAGS:

No tags found for this post.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.