US sounds alarm over Hong Kong 'exit ban' fears | Inquirer News

US sounds alarm over Hong Kong ‘exit ban’ fears

/ 02:49 PM April 29, 2021

HONG KONG Airport

A passenger wearing a face mask and protective suit, amid concerns of the COVID-19 coronavirus, talks on his phone in the arrivals hall at Hong Kong International Airport on April 4, 2020. Photo by DALE DE LA REY / AFP

HONG KONG — The United States said Thursday it was “deeply concerned” by a new Hong Kong immigration law which includes powers to stop people leaving the city, raising fears Chinese mainland-style exit bans could be deployed there.

The law was passed on Wednesday by a city legislature now devoid of opposition, as Beijing seeks to quash dissent and make the semi-autonomous city more like the authoritarian mainland following huge and often violent democracy protests.

Article continues after this advertisement

It grants the immigration chief powers to bar people from boarding planes to and from the city.

FEATURED STORIES

“We are aware of this legislation and share widespread concerns in Hong Kong about its content, potential uses, and lack of oversight or accountability,” a State Department spokesperson said in a statement on Thursday.

“We have long standing concerns about the PRC’s arbitrary use of exit bans without due process of law, including against American citizens. We are deeply concerned by the prospect of Hong Kong authorities adopting similar arbitrary measures,” the spokesperson added.

Article continues after this advertisement

Hong Kong’s government says the law will not be applied to people leaving the city and is aimed at stopping illegal immigrants traveling to the business hub.

Article continues after this advertisement

But the wording of the bill does not limit the power to arriving flights or immigrants and legal experts say it could also be deployed against anyone leaving Hong Kong.

Article continues after this advertisement

In a potential recognition of those concerns, Hong Kong’s government late Wednesday said it would draft subsidiary legislation specifying that the law would only be applied to inbound flights.

The US statement urged the Hong Kong government to honor this “public commitment” to not use the law “as a pretext to deny boarding for outbound passengers”.

Article continues after this advertisement

Britain’s Foreign Office also issued a brief statement.

“The right of people to leave Hong Kong is guaranteed under the Basic Law and should be upheld,” a spokesperson said, referring to the city’s post-handover mini-constitution.

So-called “exit bans” are often used by mainland China against activists who challenge authorities. They have also ensnared business figures involved in commercial disputes.

Local activists and lawyers from Hong Kong’s influential Bar Association warn the bill gives “apparently unfettered power” to the immigration director to do the same, should they wish to.

Under Beijing’s direction, Hong Kong’s government has swung authoritarian since 2019’s huge protests, and faith in official assurances that the city is not becoming like the mainland has been rattled by recent events.

Beijing imposed a sweeping new national security on Hong Kong last year. Authorities said it would not impact people’s freedoms and only affect “a tiny minority”.

But its broad wording and application has since criminalized much dissent and radically transformed the once politically pluralistic city.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Many of Hong Kong’s prominent pro-democracy figures have since been arrested, detained or fled overseas.

TAGS: China, Hong Kong, Immigration, Politics

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.