Prosecution likens TRO petition to Estrada’s ‘second envelop’ | Inquirer News

Prosecution likens TRO petition to Estrada’s ‘second envelop’

By: - NewsLab Lead / @MSantosINQ
/ 02:41 PM February 08, 2012

MANILA, Philippines—The prosecution team sees the efforts of the defense to prevent the opening of Supreme Court Chief Justice Renato Corona’s alleged bank accounts as similar to the infamous second envelope during the impeachment trial of former president Joseph Estrada.

“We see this effort of the defense to prevent the disclosure of the evidence as similar to the second envelope,” Marikina representative Romero Quimbo said in a press briefing Wednesday.

“What could be in there that they are so afraid of?” Quimbo said. “If Corona was not hiding anything and all his assets have been declared in his Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Net Worth (SALN) truthfully, what is the reason why they won’t let it [proceed],” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

He added that it was alarming that they will go through the Supreme Court to stop the presentation of evidence unlike in the Estrada trial when it was the senator-judges who voted to not open the second envelope.

FEATURED STORIES

“What they are actually seeking is an acquittal, not by the impeachment court of the Senate but it is an acquittal by the issuance of a TRO,” Quimbo said.

He said that “they will go the their home court and once the Supreme Court issues a TRO in favor of the Chief Justice, then it’s like we disregarded all provisions regarding accountability [in the Constitution] particularly the provisions on impeachment.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“If they do that, it would be like they already amended the Constitution,” Quimbo said.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Renato Corona, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.