SC asked to compel gov't to take thorough action against COVID-19 | Inquirer News

SC asked to compel gov’t to take thorough action against COVID-19

/ 08:40 PM September 10, 2020

MANILA, Philippines — The Supreme Court is prodded to act on their two-month-old petition to compel the government to conduct “proactive” mass testing, ramp up contact tracing and release accurate information on the country’s status in its fight against COVID-19.

In a manifestation filed by the petitioners led by former Social Welfare Secretary Judy Taguiwalo, they said the Supreme Court has been proactive in protecting judges, court employees, lawyers and litigants and they are hoping that the public could get the same kind of protection with regards to rights to health and information.

“If the Honorable Curt can do this for the Judiciary, it is hoped that the same urgency be extended to the protection of the rights to health and information, as well as the concomitant rights thereto, of the entire Filipino nation,” the petitioners said in the manifestation prepared by the National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers (NUPL).

Article continues after this advertisement

The petition was filed last July but the high court has not even issued an order for the government through the Office of the Solicitor General to comment.

FEATURED STORIES

Petitioners said based on data from the Department of Health, the number of cases in August is higher than that of March, April, May, June and July combined.

They added that the DOH also has a testing backlog of 10,982 samples as of Sept. 2, 2020, leading to the delay in testing results.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Clearly, the government, through the Department of Health, is not conducting enough COVID-19 tests nationwide,” they said.

Article continues after this advertisement

They added that while the country reverted to a stricter quarantine protocol as per the request of the medical community, no steps were taken to step up mass testing, contact tracing and dissemination of accurate information.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The government did not ramp up its mass testing efforts. There is no efficient system of contact tracing. Instead, the government reiterated that its strategy is to wait for the vaccine,” they said.

Two of the petitioners have tested positive of COVID-19. They said the RT-PCR tests were done in private institutions and there was no efficient contact tracing conducted among their close contacts.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The assertions in the Petition for Mandamus ring truer than ever. It is clear that the government, even when accorded the power to implement community quarantine for six months, has mismanaged its COVID-19 response,” the petitioners said.

They said: “The wide-ranging effects of the government’s failed COVID-19 response have been unraveling. It is now up to the SC, as the vanguard of constitutional rights to intervene and set this right.”

As of 4 p.m. Thursday, the country has a total of 248, 947 confirmed cases.

RELATED STORY

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

SC asked to compel gov’t to do ‘proactive’ mass testing, tell truth on virus fight

For more news about the novel coronavirus click here.
What you need to know about Coronavirus.
For more information on COVID-19, call the DOH Hotline: (02) 86517800 local 1149/1150.

The Inquirer Foundation supports our healthcare frontliners and is still accepting cash donations to be deposited at Banco de Oro (BDO) current account #007960018860 or donate through PayMaya using this link.

TAGS: COVID-19, mass testing, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.