DILG: ‘Balik Probinsya’ not same as ‘Hatid Probinsya’ | Inquirer News

DILG: ‘Balik Probinsya’ not same as ‘Hatid Probinsya’

MANILA, Philippines — People should not confuse the government’s “Balik Probinsya, Bagong Pag-Asa” program with its separate “Hatid Probinsya” program, the Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG) clarified on Saturday.

Interior Undersecretary Jonathan Malaya clarified that the two programs had different objectives and aimed to serve different clienteles.

The Balik Probinsya program, he said, was a long-term program designed to help low-income families in Metro Manila resettle in their home provinces, especially those who live in overcrowded informal settlement areas.

Article continues after this advertisement

Hatid Probinsya, on the other hand, is a “short-term, humanitarian effort” to send home residents stranded in Metro Manila due to travel restrictions imposed under the enhanced community quarantine.

FEATURED STORIES

‘Ill-conceived’

The DILG official made the clarification after the Gabriela party list group criticized Balik Probinsya as “haphazard and ill-conceived” and proves government’s inability to protect and provide services to the marginalized, especially during this pandemic.

But Malaya said Gabriela erred in equating Balik Probinsya and Hatid Probinsya to be one and the same program.

Article continues after this advertisement

“This is not a quick fix as Gabriela claims but a long-term solution to provide health-care and job opportunities in rural areas,” Malaya said, adding that the party list group was confusing two different programs.

Article continues after this advertisement

The government rolled out the Balik Probinsya program through Executive Order No. 114, signed by President Duterte on May 6 and the government sent off the first batch of beneficiaries on May 20.

Article continues after this advertisement

Hatid Probinsiya has also helped stranded people, including displaced overseas Filipino workers, students, travelers and simple tourists, who could not return to their provinces because of quarantine rules, said Malaya.

Three phases

But another leftist party list group, Anakpawis, argued that Balik Probinsya did not address issues that have led to systemic persecution of rural-based sectors in the country.

Article continues after this advertisement

In a statement, former Anakpawis party list Rep. Ariel Casilao denounced the Balik Probinsya program because “it blabbers about balanced regional development” without providing solutions to the real reasons people migrate to Metro Manila and other urban centers.

EO 114, which outlines the program, has three phases. In the “immediate” phase, those who wish to return to their provinces will be given aid, transportation and livelihood. The “mediate” phase promises decent jobs, a house and lot, the institutionalization of health and education services, and peace and order, while the final “long-term” phase includes the strengthening of urban renewal and rural development, as well as incentives for businesses that relocate to the provinces and the creation of a sustainable environment.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

For more news about the novel coronavirus click here.
What you need to know about Coronavirus.
For more information on COVID-19, call the DOH Hotline: (02) 86517800 local 1149/1150.

The Inquirer Foundation supports our healthcare frontliners and is still accepting cash donations to be deposited at Banco de Oro (BDO) current account #007960018860 or donate through PayMaya using this link.

TAGS: coronavirus Philippines, COVID-19

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.