PACC may invite Dela Rosa to probe on GCTA | Inquirer News

PACC may invite Dela Rosa to probe on GCTA

/ 10:34 PM September 02, 2019

Ronald dela Rosa

Sen. Ronald “Bato” Dela Rosa. (File photo by NEIL ARWIN MERCADO / INQUIRER.net)

MANILA, Philippines — The Presidential Anti-Corruption Commission (PACC) on Monday said it might invite former Bureau of Corrections (BuCor) head Sen. Ronald “Bato” dela Rosa in its probe of the controversial good conduct time allowance (GCTA) law.

“We can ask Senator Dela Rosa to give clarification, to give clarity to the issues that may come up. Hindi naman masama ‘yun eh. As I’ve said, when investigations begin, it does not mean that the respondent is already guilty of corruption,” PACC commissioner Greco Belgica told ANC.

Article continues after this advertisement

During the Senate inquiry on the issue, Dela Rosa clarified that only 120 inmates convicted of heinous crimes were released during his stint as BuCor chief. Earlier reports stated that 384 prisoners guilty of heinous crimes were released under his leadership.

FEATURED STORIES

READ: Dela Rosa: Only 1 drug convict freed under GCTA during my term at NBP

Belgica said its probe would cover the implementation of the law and the individuals involved in implementing the law.

Article continues after this advertisement

“First of all, who will be — the question of who is authorized to release these prisoners? Is it a recommending body that has to decide with the President or by the secretary or is it just the head of Bureau of Prisons? That is a very important issue,” Belgica said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Number two, what are the criteria? And clearly with the exception of heinous crimes from being part of the GCTA law, we want to know, are there prisoners involved in heinous crimes that were released? Because if that is the case then it is a very clear violation of the law and we need people to hold accountable. ” he added.

Article continues after this advertisement

The PACC commissioner said it would also look into possible criminal activities that might have happened in the implementation of the law.

“That is part of the investigation. Both administrative case and the issues that can be filed for criminal acts will be filed appropriately on appropriate offices like the Ombudsman,” he explained.

Article continues after this advertisement

Belgica then assured that the PACC’s interpretation of the law would be “independent” and that it would base its decisions and recommendations on existing laws and Supreme Court decisions.

He said the PACC would submit its recommendation to the Office of the President.

“[BuCor chief] Nick Faeldon showed that these signatures were fake. So we want to see the documents and hear his side and his explanation on what transpired with the GCTA and the freeing of these 2,000 criminals or prisoners that may have included prisoners involved in heinous crimes,” Belgica said.

“So if laws were violated, if corruption had happened, then we want to know to act on it appropriately,” he added.

Asked if he believed that corruption indeed played a role in the release of the prisoners, Belgica said: “It is easy to suspect that, but we need to see evidence, and we have yet to find people who will tile cases against that. But yes, I have heard reports like that. But as [for] evidence, we don’t have that right now.”

“We have to go through it one by one and really find out if there are violations of the law that has occurred. Were there favors rendered to some convicts and some prisoners? That is clear corruption,” he added.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

/atm

TAGS: GCTA, PACC

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.