3 ex-Reds convicted for murder of Negros Occidental judge | Inquirer News

3 ex-Reds convicted for murder of Negros Occidental judge

By: - Correspondent / @carlagomezINQ
/ 08:09 PM November 09, 2018

Three former members of the Revolutionary Proletarian Army were convicted on Friday for the murder of Regional Trial Court Judge Henry Arles of Kabankalan City, Negros Occidental, six years ago and sentenced to each suffer reclusion perpetua without parole.

Judge Editha Mina Aguba of Quezon City Regional Trial Court Branch 100 in a 37-page decision found Alejandro Capunong, Eddie Fortunado and Jessie Daguia guilty beyond reasonable doubt for the murder of Arles.

Arles was driving home from work when he was shot to death in Barangay Manalad, Ilog, Negros Occidental, 6:30 p.m. on April 24, 2012.

Article continues after this advertisement

The court was told that Capunong and Fortunado on board a tricycle blocked Arles’ car giving Daguia who was following them on board a motorcycle the opportunity to shoot Arles multiple times causing his instantaneous death.

FEATURED STORIES

The court was also told that the three were paid to kill the judge with Daguia getting P81,000, Capunong – P31,000 and Fortunado – P75,000.

“Prize and reward. Obviously was the main consideration in committing the crime,” the decision noted, but no mention was made on who paid them.

Article continues after this advertisement

The three accused were arrested on August 22, 2013.

Article continues after this advertisement

The accused claimed that they were forced to earlier confess to the killing of Arles because they were tortured and threatened, but the judge pointed out that his was not supported by independent evidence.

Article continues after this advertisement

Their physical examination by Dr. Roberto Rey San Diego, a National Bureau of Investigation medico-legal officer, does not support the claim of torture, the judge noted.

Their subsequent recantation to their confessions was more an afterthought and cannot be given merit, the judge said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Such repudiation apparently was made to escape the present case. They must not be allowed to play with evidence, much more with justice. They have no license to change their minds at their own whims and caprices without repercussions, “the judge said. The three accused cannot have their cakes and eat it too, the judge in her decision.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Insurgency

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.