CA downgrades former BID chief Mison's case to simple misconduct | Inquirer News

CA downgrades former BID chief Mison’s case to simple misconduct

/ 07:46 PM August 27, 2018

The Court of Appeals has downgraded the case against former Bureau of Immigration and Deportation (BID) Commissioner Siegfred Mison regarding the questionable reassignment of an intelligence officer in 2015 from grave to simple misconduct.

In a 15-page decision, the appeals court’s third division partly granted Mison’s petition for review as it modified the January 16, 2017 joint order of the Office of the Ombudsman.

The Ombudsman found him guilty of grave misconduct and ordered his dismissal from service.

Article continues after this advertisement

The case stemmed from the complaint filed by Intelligence Agent II Ma. Irene Arsena Bello after she was reassigned from the BI Main Office in Manila to the bureau’s Davao District Office.

FEATURED STORIES

Bello received the reassignment order on July 28, 2015. She submitted her letter of appeal on the same day and also appealed her case before the Civil Service Commission (CSC).

Later, Mison informed Bello that her name had been dropped from the rolls due to her alleged long, continuous, and unauthorized absences. In a resolution, the Ombudsman said Mison’s order lacked prior approval from the Justice Secretary.

Article continues after this advertisement

But in partly granting Mison’s petition, the appeals court said “after a careful perusal of the records, we are convinced that Mison is not guilty of grave misconduct but should be held liable [for a lighter offense].”

Article continues after this advertisement

“Findings of fact by the OMB are conclusive when supported by substantial evidence or that amount of relevant evidence which a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion. However, this rule on conclusiveness of factual findings is not an absolute one,” it added.

Article continues after this advertisement

The court said Mison is “guilty of simple misconduct and meted the penalty of three months suspension with the stern warning that a repetition of the same or similar acts will warrant a more severe penalty.”

“In the event that the penalty of suspension can no longer be enforced, a fine equivalent to [Mison’s] three – month salary shall be imposed, payable to the [Ombudsman], and may be deductible from his accrued leave credits or any receivable from his office,” the appeals court said.

Article continues after this advertisement

The CA said Mison’s petition was partly meritorious and pointed out that he is liable only for simple misconduct.

The decision was written by Associate Justice Pedro Corales and concurred in by Associate Justices Rosmari Carandang and Elihu Ybanez. /ee

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS:

No tags found for this post.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.