SC resets anew the oral argument on ICC petition to August 28 | Inquirer News

SC resets anew the oral argument on ICC petition to August 28

/ 11:42 AM August 13, 2018

Few visitors walking at the hall housing the golden seal of the Supreme Court. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO / LYN RILLON

The Supreme Court (SC) has rescheduled again the oral argument on the petition that sought to nullify the Duterte administration’s action withdrawing the country’s membership from the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC).

In its advisory, the high court reset the oral argument from August 14 to August 28.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Full resolution will come out after the en banc deliberations tomorrow. Parties are being informed,” the SC wrote in its advisory.

FEATURED STORIES

The rescheduling of the oral argument stemmed from a request of the Senate minority members, who said in their manifestation that they “do not have a representative for the oral arguments on 14 August 2018” as the SC denied the bid of Senator Leila De Lima to argue on case in behalf of the Senate.

The Senate minority members deem De Lima as the one able to fully articulate their position on the issue.

Article continues after this advertisement

Aside from De Lima, other petitioners include Senators Kiko Pangilinan, Franklin Drilon, Bam Aquino, Antonio Trillanes IV, and Risa Hontiveros.

Article continues after this advertisement

This is the second time the SC rescheduled the oral argument on the ICC petition. It was originally set on August 7 before it was moved to August 14, and then now to August 28.

Article continues after this advertisement

In their original plea filed last May 16, the opposition senators asserted that the country’s withdrawal from the Rome Statute “cannot be justified under the so-called ‘residual powers’ of the President.”

Likewise, they argued that the 1987 Constitution mandated the Senate to ratify a treaty or an international agreement, and as such, the Executive branch cannot just unilaterally repeal a law or withdraw from the treaty of international agreement.

Article continues after this advertisement

Duterte announced the country’s withdrawal from the Rome Statute last March, citing the “baseless, unprecedented and outrageous attacks” against him and his administration over its anti-drug war, which has been blamed for the death of thousands.   /kga

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: ICC, Oral argument, Petition, reset

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.