‘TRAIN Law not validly passed,’ solons tell SC   | Inquirer News

‘TRAIN Law not validly passed,’ solons tell SC  

/ 06:44 PM July 24, 2018

NOTO TRAIN LAW Members of a militant transport group protest against the latest round of
oil price increases and the tax reform law in a picket in front of the offices of Shell Petroleum Corp.
in Makati City on Thursday. —LYN RILLON

A day after President Rodrigo Duterte vowed to push through with the implementation of the Tax Reform for Acceleration and Inclusion Act (TRAIN Law), militant lawmakers went to the Supreme Court in a bid to stop him from doing so.

In its 71-page reply, petitioners maintained that the law is unconstitutional.

Article continues after this advertisement

Petitioners ACT Teachers Rep. Antonio Tinio, Bayan Muna Rep. Carlos Zarate, and Anakpawis Rep. Ariel “Ka Ayik” Casilao assisted by the National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers (NUPL) said the law was procedurally infirm because it was approved without a quorum as required in the Constitution.

FEATURED STORIES

“The TRAIN Law was not validly passed. It became law in violation of the Sections 16 (2) and 27 (1) of Article VI of the Constitution, among others,” petitioners said.

Zarate and company contested the argument of the solicitor general that official journals of the House during deliberations on the TRAIN Law on Dec. 13 last year where 232 out of a total of 295 members were present proved that the law was validly passed.

Article continues after this advertisement

“There is no evidence to prove the due enactment of RA 10963. On the other hand, there are several pieces of evidence proving that it was passed in violation of the quorum requirement in Section 16 (2), Article VI of the 1987 Constitution and the requirement of a bill passed by Congress in Section 27, Article VI,” petitioners claimed.

Article continues after this advertisement

Section 16 (2), Article 6 of the 1987 Constitution and Section 75 of Rule XI of the House Rules both require the House to comply with the quorum requirement of the majority of the House membership before they can do any legislative business.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The absence of a quorum and a vote are facts pointing to prima facie grave abuse of discretion which Respondents attempt to throw a veil over,” petitioners added.

The TRAIN law, which is the centerpiece of the Duterte administration’s effort to reform taxation and earn additional revenues, promises lower personal income tax rates and increase excise taxes on petroleum products, automobiles, sugar-sweetened beverages and tobacco.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS:

No tags found for this post.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.