Bam Aquino disappointed that Duterte defended TRAIN in his Sona | Inquirer News

Bam Aquino disappointed that Duterte defended TRAIN in his Sona

/ 07:55 PM July 23, 2018

Opposition Senator Paolo Benigno Aquino III on Monday expressed disappointment after President Rodrigo Duterte defended a controversial tax reform law and even pushed for the passage of its second phase.

In his State of the Nation Address (Sona), Duterte rejected calls to suspend the Tax Reform for Acceleration and Inclusion (Train) Law.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: Duterte rejects calls to suspend TRAIN law 

FEATURED STORIES

In a chance interview, Aquino admitted that he was pleased that the President mentioned the legislative agenda that he worked on, particularly the National Land Use Act.

“To be frank, ang hinihintay ko talaga ay ‘yung pagbanggit ng solusyon sa pagtaas ng presyo ng bilihin,” Aquino told reporters.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Unfortunately, wala talagang nabanggit sa batas na ito,” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

The senator said he was also disappointed when it came to the TRAIN law.

“I pushed for the repeal of some parts of Train Law but unfortunately mas pinanindigan pa ito,” Aquino added.

He also said the Filipinos were hoping to hear from the President his proposed solution to the skyrocketing prices of basic goods and services.   /vvp

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Visit our Sona 2024 live coverage to stay updated with the latest #SONA2024 news and stories.
TAGS: Bam Aquino, Sona, sona2018, Train

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.