Polish court rules against man who wouldn't serve LGBT group | Inquirer News

Polish court rules against man who wouldn’t serve LGBT group

/ 01:38 PM June 15, 2018

WARSAW, Poland — Poland’s Supreme Court ruled on Thursday against a print shop employee, who refused to print banners for an LGBT business group because he did not want to “promote” the gay rights movement.

The country’s top court said it was upholding the ruling of a lower court. The Regional Court in Lodz had argued the principle of equality before the law meant the printer did not have the right to withhold services from the LGBT Business Forum.

The case was brought to the Supreme Court by Zbigniew Ziobro, the justice minister and attorney general, who slammed Thursday’s ruling as “against freedom.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“The Supreme Court has stood on the side of state violence in the service of the ideology of homosexual activists,” Ziobro said.

FEATURED STORIES

The Campaign Against Homophobia, which gave legal support to the LGBT Business Forum, welcomed the ruling.

The decision comes as the European Union has been warning that Poland’s judicial independence is under threat due to new laws that give the conservative ruling party, Law and Justice, greater power over court appointments.

Article continues after this advertisement

A new law regulating the Supreme Court will take effect on July 3, and it was not clear if the court will be as free in the future to make rulings against positions supported by the government.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Polish case comes as similar cases have been brought in courts in America. In the most high-profile case, the United States Supreme Court sided with a Colorado baker, who refused to make a wedding cake for a same-sex couple.

Article continues after this advertisement

Jaroslaw Jagura, a lawyer with the Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights, said there were parallels to the US case.

He said the Polish Supreme Court ruled that sexual orientation, race or other features of a person cannot be the basis for refusal to offer a service but that if the nature of the service violates the entrepreneur’s freedom of conscience, it could be.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Therefore, any such refusal should be considered individually. As a result, sometimes freedom of conscience and religion will be a legitimate reason for the refusal to perform the service, and at other times, may constitute a manifestation of unauthorized discrimination,” Jagura said.   /kga

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: court, Equality, Freedom, gender, homosexual, LGBT, Poland, rights

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.